PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHDG vs. QQHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHDG vs. QQHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF (JHDG) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


JHDG

1D
-0.31%
1M
-0.79%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

QQHG

1D
-0.30%
1M
-1.75%
6M
6.18%
YTD
7.11%
1Y
16.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.11M$1.05M$1.10M
$44.43K$111.62K$65.97K

JHDG vs. QQHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JHDG and QQHG is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026

0.79

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHDG vs. QQHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHDG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QQHG
QQHG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QQHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQHG Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
QQHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQHG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHDG vs. QQHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF (JHDG) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHDGQQHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.06

JHDG vs. QQHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHDG vs. QQHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHDG drawdown since its inception was -2.61%, smaller than the maximum QQHG drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHDG and QQHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHDGQQHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-6.18%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-4.12%

+1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.66%

-1.11%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

Volatility

JHDG vs. QQHG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHDGQQHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.16%

10.60%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.16%

10.22%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.16%

10.22%

-0.06%

JHDG vs. QQHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHDG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QQHG's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHDG vs. QQHG - Dividend Comparison

JHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than QQHG's 0.27% yield.


PositionTTM2025
JHDG
John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF
0.10%0.00%
QQHG
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
0.27%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHDG and QQHG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JHDG.

QQHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.10% for JHDG.

They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for JHDG and 0.45% for QQHG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHDG and QQHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer