JHCR vs. JHLN
JHCR (John Hancock Core Bond ETF) and JHLN (John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHCR is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by John Hancock, while JHLN is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by John Hancock. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. JHCR charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for JHLN.
Performance
JHCR vs. JHLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHCR achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than JHLN's 1.07% return.
JHCR
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JHLN
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JHCR vs. JHLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JHCR John Hancock Core Bond ETF | 0.48% | 2.62% |
JHLN John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF | 1.07% | 1.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHCR and JHLN is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHCR vs. JHLN — Risk / Return Rank
JHCR
JHLN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JHCR vs. JHLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR) and John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF (JHLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHCR | JHLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.24 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHCR vs. JHLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHCR drawdown since its inception was -2.85%, which is greater than JHLN's maximum drawdown of -1.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCR and JHLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHCR | JHLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.85% | -1.46% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -0.07% | -1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.85% | -0.30% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | — | — |
Volatility
JHCR vs. JHLN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHCR | JHLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.16% | 2.58% | +1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.70% | 2.58% | +2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.70% | 2.58% | +2.12% |
JHCR vs. JHLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHCR has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than JHLN's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHCR vs. JHLN - Dividend Comparison
JHCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than JHLN's 4.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JHCR John Hancock Core Bond ETF | 4.25% | 4.65% | 0.20% |
JHLN John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF | 4.30% | 1.88% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHCR and JHLN have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JHCR is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JHCR is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for JHLN.
JHLN has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 4.25% for JHCR.
JHCR is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while JHLN is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHCR and 0.59% for JHLN.
Find the right allocation for JHCR and JHLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer