PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHCIX vs. PUDZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHCIX vs. PUDZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JHCIX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHCIX achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly lower than PUDZX's 13.05% return.


JHCIX

1D
0.41%
1M
-0.73%
6M
1.33%
YTD
2.18%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
6.59%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.72%

PUDZX

1D
0.28%
1M
2.38%
6M
6.88%
YTD
13.05%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
6.68%
ALL TIME*
4.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JHCIX vs. PUDZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHCIX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio
2.18%9.73%4.43%9.16%-14.57%2.96%10.74%12.46%-1.97%3.08%
PUDZX
PGIM Real Assets Fund
13.05%13.40%8.61%3.26%-2.76%18.49%4.84%16.29%-9.20%4.96%

Correlation

The correlation between JHCIX and PUDZX is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between JHCIX and PUDZX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHCIX vs. PUDZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JHCIX
JHCIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
JHCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
JHCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

PUDZX
PUDZX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PUDZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUDZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUDZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PUDZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUDZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JHCIX vs. PUDZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JHCIX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHCIXPUDZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.49

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

4.10

-2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.34

12.61

-5.27

JHCIX vs. PUDZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the PUDZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHCIX and PUDZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHCIX vs. PUDZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHCIX drawdown since its inception was -19.29%, smaller than the maximum PUDZX drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCIX and PUDZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHCIXPUDZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.29%

-21.53%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.01%

-5.01%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.67%

-8.20%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.29%

-17.98%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-2.10%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-5.24%

+1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

1.63%

-0.68%

Volatility

JHCIX vs. PUDZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JHCIX) is 1.21%, while PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) has a volatility of 1.88%. This indicates that JHCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PUDZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHCIXPUDZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

1.88%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.90%

6.16%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.07%

7.77%

-2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.52%

10.42%

-3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.68%

9.68%

-4.00%

JHCIX vs. PUDZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHCIX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than PUDZX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JHCIX vs. PUDZX - Dividend Comparison

JHCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than PUDZX's 7.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHCIX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio
3.50%3.58%3.41%7.31%9.12%5.35%4.90%4.11%3.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PUDZX
PGIM Real Assets Fund
7.09%8.93%6.67%3.66%9.10%13.00%4.94%3.40%2.14%2.10%1.39%1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHCIX and PUDZX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PUDZX has higher volatility (1.88%) compared to JHCIX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHCIX dropped -19.29% vs PUDZX's -21.53%.

PUDZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHCIX and PUDZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer