PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHCIX vs. NWQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHCIX vs. NWQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JHCIX) and Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHCIX achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly lower than NWQIX's 5.55% return.


JHCIX

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.90%
YTD
3.02%
6M
3.00%
1Y
8.88%
3Y*
7.19%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*

NWQIX

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.46%
YTD
5.55%
6M
5.96%
1Y
14.35%
3Y*
10.77%
5Y*
4.42%
10Y*
5.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHCIX vs. NWQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHCIX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio
3.02%9.73%4.43%9.16%-14.57%2.96%10.74%12.46%-1.97%3.08%
NWQIX
Nuveen Flexible Income Fund
5.55%11.74%6.03%11.61%-13.64%4.94%5.54%18.57%-4.07%8.17%

Correlation

The correlation between JHCIX and NWQIX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.73

The correlation between JHCIX and NWQIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHCIX vs. NWQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHCIX
JHCIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
JHCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
JHCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

NWQIX
NWQIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
NWQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NWQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHCIX vs. NWQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JHCIX) and Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHCIXNWQIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.82

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

4.98

-2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.46

23.52

-13.06

JHCIX vs. NWQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHCIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is lower than the NWQIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHCIX and NWQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHCIX vs. NWQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHCIX drawdown since its inception was -19.29%, smaller than the maximum NWQIX drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCIX and NWQIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHCIXNWQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.29%

-23.89%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.01%

-2.94%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.05%

-4.59%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.29%

-17.75%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.15%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-3.00%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.62%

+0.32%

Volatility

JHCIX vs. NWQIX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JHCIX) has a higher volatility of 1.69% compared to Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX) at 1.23%. This indicates that JHCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHCIXNWQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.69%

1.23%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.85%

3.14%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.11%

3.98%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.50%

5.70%

+0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.69%

6.33%

-0.64%

JHCIX vs. NWQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHCIX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than NWQIX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHCIX vs. NWQIX - Dividend Comparison

JHCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than NWQIX's 5.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHCIX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio
3.48%3.58%3.41%7.31%9.12%5.35%4.90%4.11%3.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NWQIX
Nuveen Flexible Income Fund
5.50%6.09%5.20%7.84%7.02%4.39%4.82%5.71%6.23%5.67%5.52%5.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHCIX and NWQIX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHCIX has higher volatility (1.69%) compared to NWQIX (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHCIX dropped -19.29% vs NWQIX's -23.89%.

NWQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHCIX and NWQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer