JHCIX vs. DGTSX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JHCIX (John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio) and DGTSX (DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, JHCIX returned 2.26%/yr vs 5.27%/yr for DGTSX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JHCIX charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for DGTSX.

Performance

JHCIX vs. DGTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JHCIX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHCIX achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly lower than DGTSX's 4.23% return.

JHCIX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 3.02%
• 6M: 3.00%
• 1Y: 8.88%
• 3Y*: 7.19%
• 5Y*: 2.26%
• 10Y*: —

DGTSX

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 4.23%
• 6M: 4.08%
• 1Y: 9.62%
• 3Y*: 8.40%
• 5Y*: 5.27%
• 10Y*: 5.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHCIX vs. DGTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JHCIX John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio	3.02%	9.73%	4.43%	9.16%	-14.57%	2.96%	10.74%	12.46%	-1.97%	3.08%
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio	4.23%	8.39%	7.43%	8.93%	-8.06%	10.20%	7.29%	9.80%	-1.85%	4.93%

Correlation

The correlation between JHCIX and DGTSX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017	0.70

The correlation between JHCIX and DGTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JHCIX vs. DGTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHCIX

JHCIX Risk / Return Rank: 55
JHCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
JHCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
JHCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
JHCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
JHCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

DGTSX

DGTSX Risk / Return Rank: 88
DGTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
DGTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
DGTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DGTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
DGTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHCIX vs. DGTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JHCIX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JHCIX	DGTSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	2.77	-0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	4.13	-1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.57	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	3.76	-1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.46	16.52	-6.05

JHCIX vs. DGTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHCIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the DGTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHCIX and DGTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JHCIX vs. DGTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHCIX drawdown since its inception was -19.29%, which is greater than DGTSX's maximum drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCIX and DGTSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHCIX	DGTSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.29%	-16.71%	-2.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.01%	-2.64%	-1.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.05%	-7.46%	+0.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.29%	-11.26%	-8.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-11.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	-0.20%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.82%	-1.64%	-2.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	0.60%	+0.34%

Volatility

JHCIX vs. DGTSX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JHCIX) has a higher volatility of 1.69% compared to DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) at 1.38%. This indicates that JHCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHCIX	DGTSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.69%	1.38%	+0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.85%	2.97%	+0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.11%	3.60%	+1.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.50%	5.98%	+0.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.69%	5.24%	+0.45%

JHCIX vs. DGTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHCIX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than DGTSX's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JHCIX vs. DGTSX - Dividend Comparison

JHCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than DGTSX's 5.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio	5.70%	5.54%	7.28%	4.75%	2.77%	7.62%	2.12%	2.57%	2.99%	1.25%	1.26%	1.50%
JHCIX John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio	3.48%	3.58%	3.41%	7.31%	9.12%	5.35%	4.90%	4.11%	3.61%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHCIX and DGTSX in my portfolio?

JHCIX and DGTSX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JHCIX or DGTSX?

JHCIX has higher volatility (1.69%) compared to DGTSX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHCIX dropped -19.29% vs DGTSX's -16.71%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.