PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHBSX vs. BCPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHBSX vs. BCPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6 (JHBSX) and Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund (BCPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JHBSX having a -0.54% return and BCPIX slightly higher at -0.53%. Over the past 10 years, JHBSX has outperformed BCPIX with an annualized return of 2.09%, while BCPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.54% annualized return.


JHBSX

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.33%
6M
-0.91%
YTD
-0.54%
1Y
2.33%
3Y*
3.87%
5Y*
-0.59%
10Y*
2.09%
ALL TIME*
3.09%

BCPIX

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.08%
6M
-0.57%
YTD
-0.53%
1Y
1.72%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
0.37%
10Y*
1.54%
ALL TIME*
1.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JHBSX vs. BCPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHBSX
John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6
-0.54%7.79%2.10%5.10%-14.95%-0.31%10.74%10.52%-0.73%5.38%
BCPIX
Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund
-0.53%6.71%1.98%6.70%-10.78%-0.34%5.77%6.65%-0.45%2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between JHBSX and BCPIX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2011

0.89

The correlation between JHBSX and BCPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHBSX vs. BCPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JHBSX
JHBSX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
JHBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
JHBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

BCPIX
BCPIX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BCPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BCPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JHBSX vs. BCPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6 (JHBSX) and Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund (BCPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHBSXBCPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.14

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

1.08

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.87

2.96

-0.09

JHBSX vs. BCPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHBSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the BCPIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHBSX and BCPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHBSX vs. BCPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHBSX drawdown since its inception was -19.78%, smaller than the maximum BCPIX drawdown of -22.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHBSX and BCPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHBSXBCPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.78%

-22.43%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.24%

-2.63%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.38%

-4.70%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.78%

-15.19%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.78%

-15.19%

-4.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.15%

-1.74%

-1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-4.23%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

0.95%

+0.29%

Volatility

JHBSX vs. BCPIX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6 (JHBSX) and Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund (BCPIX) have volatilities of 0.97% and 0.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHBSXBCPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.97%

0.95%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.15%

2.79%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.99%

3.50%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.93%

5.11%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.97%

4.18%

+0.79%

JHBSX vs. BCPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHBSX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BCPIX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHBSX vs. BCPIX - Dividend Comparison

JHBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than BCPIX's 3.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCPIX
Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund
3.94%4.32%3.67%2.91%2.54%1.89%1.76%2.77%2.90%2.49%2.84%2.72%
JHBSX
John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6
4.41%4.65%4.20%2.78%3.31%3.67%5.89%4.15%3.93%3.65%3.62%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, JHBSX and BCPIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JHBSX has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to BCPIX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHBSX dropped -19.78% vs BCPIX's -22.43%.

JHBSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHBSX and BCPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer