PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JGRE.L vs. PRWU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JGRE.L vs. PRWU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JGRE.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JGRE.L is traded in GBp, while PRWU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRWU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


JGRE.L

1D
0.12%
1M
4.66%
YTD
9.61%
6M
10.05%
1Y
26.28%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*

PRWU.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JGRE.L vs. PRWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JGRE.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
9.61%11.65%20.63%18.59%2.69%
PRWU.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)
0.00%0.00%20.63%18.25%1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between JGRE.L and PRWU.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.64

The correlation between JGRE.L and PRWU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

JGRE.L vs. PRWU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JGRE.L
PRWU.L

Technology

28.6%
27.0%

Financial Services

15.4%
15.8%

Industrials

11.3%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.5%

Communication Services

9.1%
8.1%

Healthcare

8.9%
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
6.1%

Energy

4.2%
4.0%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.2%

Utilities

2.9%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.1%

Technology

JGRE.L
28.6%
PRWU.L
27.0%

Financial Services

JGRE.L
15.4%
PRWU.L
15.8%

Industrials

JGRE.L
11.3%
PRWU.L
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

JGRE.L
10.1%
PRWU.L
10.5%

Communication Services

JGRE.L
9.1%
PRWU.L
8.1%

Healthcare

JGRE.L
8.9%
PRWU.L
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

JGRE.L
4.6%
PRWU.L
6.1%

Energy

JGRE.L
4.2%
PRWU.L
4.0%

Basic Materials

JGRE.L
3.2%
PRWU.L
3.2%

Utilities

JGRE.L
2.9%
PRWU.L
2.7%

Real Estate

JGRE.L
1.7%
PRWU.L
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JGRE.L vs. PRWU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGRE.L
JGRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JGRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
JGRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PRWU.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGRE.L vs. PRWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JGRE.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JGRE.LPRWU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.25

JGRE.L vs. PRWU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JGRE.LPRWU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

Drawdowns

JGRE.L vs. PRWU.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JGRE.LPRWU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

Volatility

JGRE.L vs. PRWU.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JGRE.LPRWU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.06%

JGRE.L vs. PRWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGRE.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWU.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JGRE.L vs. PRWU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JGRE.L nor PRWU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JGRE.L and PRWU.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRWU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRWU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JGRE.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JGRE.L and 0.05% for PRWU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JGRE.L and PRWU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer