PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JGACX vs. QQQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JGACX vs. QQQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund (JGACX) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGACX achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly lower than QQQX's 9.72% return. Over the past 10 years, JGACX has outperformed QQQX with an annualized return of 18.22%, while QQQX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.67% annualized return.


JGACX

1D
1.50%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
4.44%
6M
3.61%
1Y
18.45%
3Y*
23.26%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
18.22%

QQQX

1D
-0.42%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
9.72%
6M
10.69%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
13.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JGACX vs. QQQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JGACX
JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund
4.44%14.89%41.22%39.06%-30.57%20.93%52.51%35.24%-2.01%28.54%
QQQX
Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
9.72%14.87%25.61%21.68%-27.39%25.32%15.75%28.83%-11.68%39.19%

Correlation

The correlation between JGACX and QQQX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007

0.75

The correlation between JGACX and QQQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JGACX vs. QQQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGACX
JGACX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
JGACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGACX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
JGACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGACX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQX
QQQX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QQQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGACX vs. QQQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund (JGACX) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JGACXQQQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.36

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

3.21

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.53

13.97

-10.44

JGACX vs. QQQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the QQQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGACX and QQQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JGACX vs. QQQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGACX drawdown since its inception was -54.27%, smaller than the maximum QQQX drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGACX and QQQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JGACXQQQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.27%

-57.25%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.94%

-9.11%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.45%

-22.80%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.58%

-29.33%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.58%

-35.96%

+0.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.83%

-3.61%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.24%

-8.01%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.10%

2.09%

+3.01%

Volatility

JGACX vs. QQQX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund (JGACX) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) at 5.70%. This indicates that JGACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JGACXQQQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

5.70%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.88%

12.36%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.37%

15.01%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.63%

19.92%

+2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.99%

21.12%

+1.87%

JGACX vs. QQQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGACX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

JGACX vs. QQQX - Dividend Comparison

JGACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.49%, more than QQQX's 8.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JGACX
JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund
16.49%17.22%16.40%0.81%0.54%19.49%12.46%11.71%11.44%0.16%0.00%3.95%
QQQX
Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
8.28%7.85%6.73%7.26%9.66%5.85%6.00%6.49%8.40%5.95%7.54%7.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


JGACX and QQQX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JGACX has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to QQQX (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JGACX dropped -54.27% vs QQQX's -57.25%.

QQQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JGACX and QQQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer