JGACX vs. QQQX
JGACX (JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund) and QQQX (Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund) are both mutual funds - JGACX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by JPMorgan, while QQQX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Nuveen. Over the past 10 years, JGACX returned 18.22%/yr vs 13.67%/yr for QQQX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JGACX charges 1.54%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QQQX.
Performance
JGACX vs. QQQX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JGACX achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly lower than QQQX's 9.72% return. Over the past 10 years, JGACX has outperformed QQQX with an annualized return of 18.22%, while QQQX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.67% annualized return.
JGACX
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 4.44%
- 6M
- 3.61%
- 1Y
- 18.45%
- 3Y*
- 23.26%
- 5Y*
- 12.96%
- 10Y*
- 18.22%
QQQX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 29.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- 13.67%
JGACX vs. QQQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGACX JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund | 4.44% | 14.89% | 41.22% | 39.06% | -30.57% | 20.93% | 52.51% | 35.24% | -2.01% | 28.54% |
QQQX Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund | 9.72% | 14.87% | 25.61% | 21.68% | -27.39% | 25.32% | 15.75% | 28.83% | -11.68% | 39.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between JGACX and QQQX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | 0.75 |
The correlation between JGACX and QQQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JGACX vs. QQQX — Risk / Return Rank
JGACX
QQQX
JGACX vs. QQQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund (JGACX) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JGACX | QQQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.36 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 3.21 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.53 | 13.97 | -10.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JGACX vs. QQQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JGACX drawdown since its inception was -54.27%, smaller than the maximum QQQX drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGACX and QQQX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JGACX | QQQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.27% | -57.25% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.94% | -9.11% | -6.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.45% | -22.80% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.58% | -29.33% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.58% | -35.96% | +0.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.83% | -3.61% | +0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.24% | -8.01% | -1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | 2.09% | +3.01% |
Volatility
JGACX vs. QQQX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund (JGACX) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) at 5.70%. This indicates that JGACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JGACX | QQQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 5.70% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.88% | 12.36% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.37% | 15.01% | +1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 19.92% | +2.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.99% | 21.12% | +1.87% |
JGACX vs. QQQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JGACX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
JGACX vs. QQQX - Dividend Comparison
JGACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.49%, more than QQQX's 8.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGACX JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund | 16.49% | 17.22% | 16.40% | 0.81% | 0.54% | 19.49% | 12.46% | 11.71% | 11.44% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 3.95% |
QQQX Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund | 8.28% | 7.85% | 6.73% | 7.26% | 9.66% | 5.85% | 6.00% | 6.49% | 8.40% | 5.95% | 7.54% | 7.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JGACX and QQQX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JGACX has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to QQQX (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JGACX dropped -54.27% vs QQQX's -57.25%.
QQQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JGACX and QQQX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer