JFLX vs. YCS
JFLX (JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - JFLX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). JFLX is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. JFLX charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
JFLX vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JFLX achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 11.45% return.
JFLX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 8.08%
- YTD
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- 29.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.64%
- 5Y*
- 24.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.99%
JFLX vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JFLX JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF | 2.08% | 1.48% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 11.45% | 12.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between JFLX and YCS is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JFLX vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
JFLX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YCS
JFLX vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF (JFLX) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JFLX | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.61 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.41 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JFLX vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JFLX drawdown since its inception was -2.36%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFLX and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JFLX | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -49.56% | +47.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | 0.00% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.37% | -19.80% | +19.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.62% | — |
Volatility
JFLX vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JFLX | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61% | 16.54% | -13.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.61% | 21.09% | -18.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.61% | 18.70% | -16.09% |
JFLX vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
JFLX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
JFLX vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
JFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
JFLX JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF | 3.62% | 1.27% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JFLX and YCS have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JFLX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JFLX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
JFLX has the higher dividend yield at 3.62%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
JFLX is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for JFLX and 1.00% for YCS.
Find the right allocation for JFLX and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer