JFLX vs. PDBC
JFLX (JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF) and PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JFLX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. JFLX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDBC.
Performance
JFLX vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JFLX achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 34.72% return.
JFLX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PDBC
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -3.98%
- YTD
- 34.72%
- 6M
- 34.37%
- 1Y
- 44.52%
- 3Y*
- 14.06%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.55%
JFLX vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JFLX JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF | 1.82% | 1.26% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 34.72% | 2.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between JFLX and PDBC is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JFLX vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
JFLX
PDBC
JFLX vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF (JFLX) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JFLX | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.79 | 0.23 | +1.56 |
Drawdowns
JFLX vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JFLX drawdown since its inception was -2.36%, smaller than the maximum PDBC drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFLX and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JFLX | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -49.52% | +47.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -5.61% | +5.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.40% | -23.20% | +22.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.42% | — |
Volatility
JFLX vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JFLX | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59% | 18.64% | -16.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.59% | 19.12% | -16.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.59% | 17.78% | -15.19% |
JFLX vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
JFLX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
JFLX vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
JFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, more than PDBC's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JFLX JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF | 3.28% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 2.85% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JFLX and PDBC have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JFLX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JFLX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.
JFLX has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 2.85% for PDBC.
JFLX is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while PDBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for JFLX and 0.58% for PDBC.
Find the right allocation for JFLX and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer