JFLX vs. ABXB
JFLX (JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF) and ABXB (Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. JFLX is actively managed, while ABXB is passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JFLX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for ABXB.
Performance
JFLX vs. ABXB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JFLX achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly higher than ABXB's 0.73% return.
JFLX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABXB
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- 6.73%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- —
JFLX vs. ABXB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JFLX JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF | 2.21% | 1.48% |
ABXB Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF | 0.73% | 1.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between JFLX and ABXB is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JFLX vs. ABXB — Risk / Return Rank
JFLX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ABXB
JFLX vs. ABXB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF (JFLX) and Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF (ABXB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JFLX | ABXB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.34 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.28 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JFLX vs. ABXB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JFLX drawdown since its inception was -2.36%, smaller than the maximum ABXB drawdown of -16.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFLX and ABXB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JFLX | ABXB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -16.96% | +14.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -1.07% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.38% | -5.68% | +5.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.08% | — |
Volatility
JFLX vs. ABXB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JFLX | ABXB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67% | 3.66% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.67% | 5.62% | -2.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.67% | 5.44% | -2.77% |
JFLX vs. ABXB - Expense Ratio Comparison
JFLX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ABXB's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
JFLX vs. ABXB - Dividend Comparison
JFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than ABXB's 5.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABXB Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF | 5.17% | 5.50% | 15.35% | 4.79% | 3.18% | 3.40% | 0.37% |
JFLX JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF | 3.27% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JFLX and ABXB have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JFLX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JFLX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for ABXB.
ABXB has the higher dividend yield at 5.17%, compared with 3.27% for JFLX.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Abacus. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for JFLX and 0.62% for ABXB.
Find the right allocation for JFLX and ABXB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer