JFLX vs. ABXB

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JFLX (JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF) and ABXB (Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. JFLX is actively managed, while ABXB is passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JFLX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for ABXB.

Performance

JFLX vs. ABXB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF (JFLX) and Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF (ABXB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JFLX achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than ABXB's 0.31% return.

JFLX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 1.82%
• 6M: 2.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ABXB

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 0.31%
• 6M: 0.65%
• 1Y: 5.21%
• 3Y*: 6.44%
• 5Y*: 1.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JFLX vs. ABXB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JFLX JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF	1.82%	1.26%
ABXB Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF	0.31%	1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between JFLX and ABXB is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

JFLX vs. ABXB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABXB

ABXB Risk / Return Rank: 40
ABXB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
ABXB Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ABXB Omega Ratio Rank: 44
ABXB Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
ABXB Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JFLX vs. ABXB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF (JFLX) and Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF (ABXB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JFLX	ABXB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.79	0.25	+1.54

Drawdowns

JFLX vs. ABXB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JFLX drawdown since its inception was -2.36%, smaller than the maximum ABXB drawdown of -16.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFLX and ABXB.

Drawdown Indicators

	JFLX	ABXB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.36%	-16.96%	+14.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.43%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.81%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-1.49%	+1.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.40%	-5.73%	+5.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.02%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JFLX	ABXB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.97%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.74%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.59%	3.47%	-0.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.59%	5.59%	-3.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.59%	5.44%	-2.85%

JFLX vs. ABXB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JFLX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ABXB's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

JFLX vs. ABXB - Dividend Comparison

JFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than ABXB's 5.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ABXB Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF	5.19%	5.50%	15.35%	4.79%	3.18%	3.40%	0.37%
JFLX JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF	3.28%	1.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JFLX and ABXB in my portfolio?

JFLX and ABXB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JFLX or ABXB?

On fees, JFLX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JFLX or ABXB?

JFLX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for ABXB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JFLX or ABXB?

ABXB has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 3.28% for JFLX.

What is the main difference between JFLX and ABXB?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Abacus. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for JFLX and 0.62% for ABXB.