JFLI vs. DYTA
JFLI (JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF) and DYTA (SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JFLI returned 21.09% vs 15.98% for DYTA. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JFLI charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for DYTA.
Performance
JFLI vs. DYTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JFLI achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly higher than DYTA's 8.48% return.
JFLI
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 6M
- 9.51%
- 1Y
- 21.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DYTA
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 5.10%
- YTD
- 8.48%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 15.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JFLI vs. DYTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JFLI JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF | 9.90% | 9.49% |
DYTA SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF | 8.48% | 3.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between JFLI and DYTA is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | 0.84 |
The correlation between JFLI and DYTA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JFLI vs. DYTA — Risk / Return Rank
JFLI
DYTA
JFLI vs. DYTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI) and SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JFLI | DYTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.37 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 1.72 | +1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.34 | 8.90 | +6.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JFLI | DYTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 1.65 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 1.11 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
JFLI vs. DYTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JFLI drawdown since its inception was -12.87%, which is greater than DYTA's maximum drawdown of -9.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFLI and DYTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JFLI | DYTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.87% | -9.41% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.67% | -9.33% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.27% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.44% | -2.21% | +0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.38% | 1.80% | -0.42% |
Volatility
JFLI vs. DYTA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI) is 2.35%, while SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that JFLI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DYTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JFLI | DYTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 2.92% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.93% | 9.37% | -2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.39% | 9.72% | -1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.90% | 10.84% | +1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.90% | 10.84% | +1.06% |
JFLI vs. DYTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
JFLI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DYTA's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
JFLI vs. DYTA - Dividend Comparison
JFLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.18%, more than DYTA's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DYTA SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF | 1.51% | 1.64% | 10.80% | 0.89% |
JFLI JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF | 7.18% | 6.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JFLI and DYTA have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DYTA has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to JFLI (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JFLI dropped -12.87% vs DYTA's -9.41%.
On 1-year performance, JFLI leads with 21.09% vs 15.98% for DYTA. On fees, JFLI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JFLI has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JFLI has performed better with a 21.09% return vs 15.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JFLI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DYTA.
JFLI has the higher dividend yield at 7.18%, compared with 1.51% for DYTA.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Summit Global Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JFLI and 1.04% for DYTA.
JFLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JFLI and DYTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer