PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JFIIX vs. DAFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JFIIX vs. DAFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Floating Rate Income Fund (JFIIX) and Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund (DAFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JFIIX achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than DAFRX's 1.75% return. Over the past 10 years, JFIIX has outperformed DAFRX with an annualized return of 4.25%, while DAFRX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.84% annualized return.


JFIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.14%
6M
0.87%
YTD
0.73%
1Y
2.29%
3Y*
4.90%
5Y*
4.18%
10Y*
4.25%
ALL TIME*
4.19%

DAFRX

1D
-0.60%
1M
-0.36%
6M
1.52%
YTD
1.75%
1Y
2.93%
3Y*
6.39%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*
3.84%
ALL TIME*
3.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JFIIX vs. DAFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JFIIX
John Hancock Funds Floating Rate Income Fund
0.73%4.78%7.19%11.06%-3.83%4.50%2.91%9.34%-0.88%3.02%
DAFRX
Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund
1.75%5.04%7.26%13.05%-2.54%3.51%-0.09%7.18%-1.06%2.71%

Correlation

The correlation between JFIIX and DAFRX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2013

0.52

The correlation between JFIIX and DAFRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JFIIX vs. DAFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JFIIX
JFIIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
JFIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
JFIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

DAFRX
DAFRX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DAFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DAFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JFIIX vs. DAFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Floating Rate Income Fund (JFIIX) and Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund (DAFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JFIIXDAFRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.37

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.94

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.92

6.20

-2.28

JFIIX vs. DAFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JFIIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the DAFRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JFIIX and DAFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JFIIX vs. DAFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JFIIX drawdown since its inception was -29.82%, which is greater than DAFRX's maximum drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFIIX and DAFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JFIIXDAFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.82%

-19.42%

-10.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.53%

-1.45%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.68%

-3.34%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.64%

-7.08%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.88%

-19.42%

-1.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.72%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.90%

-0.96%

-0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

0.45%

+0.10%

Volatility

JFIIX vs. DAFRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Floating Rate Income Fund (JFIIX) is 0.24%, while Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund (DAFRX) has a volatility of 0.70%. This indicates that JFIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JFIIXDAFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.24%

0.70%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.63%

1.44%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29%

1.79%

+0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.85%

2.26%

+0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.84%

3.39%

+0.45%

JFIIX vs. DAFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JFIIX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than DAFRX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

JFIIX vs. DAFRX - Dividend Comparison

JFIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.97%, less than DAFRX's 6.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAFRX
Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund
6.80%7.26%7.87%8.91%5.76%3.13%3.27%4.36%4.30%3.31%3.01%3.13%
JFIIX
John Hancock Funds Floating Rate Income Fund
5.97%6.96%6.92%6.51%7.33%3.44%4.36%5.72%4.65%4.52%5.42%5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


JFIIX and DAFRX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DAFRX has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to JFIIX (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JFIIX dropped -29.82% vs DAFRX's -19.42%.

DAFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JFIIX and DAFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer