JETD vs. EFZ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

JETD (MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and EFZ (ProShares Short MSCI EAFE) are both Inverse Equities funds - JETD tracks the Prime Airlines Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%) while EFZ tracks the MSCI EAFE Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JETD returned -51.55%/yr vs -9.25%/yr for EFZ. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

JETD vs. EFZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (JETD) and ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JETD achieves a -48.45% return, which is significantly lower than EFZ's -7.84% return.

JETD

• 1D: 1.63%
• 1M: -2.16%
• 6M: -37.18%
• YTD: -48.45%
• 1Y: -66.31%
• 3Y*: -51.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EFZ

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 1.09%
• 6M: -4.91%
• YTD: -7.84%
• 1Y: -14.64%
• 3Y*: -9.25%
• 5Y*: -6.05%
• 10Y*: -8.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JETD vs. EFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JETD MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-48.45%	-59.89%	-51.72%	-1.53%
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE	-7.84%	-20.92%	2.90%	-1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between JETD and EFZ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2023	0.58

The correlation between JETD and EFZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JETD vs. EFZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JETD

JETD Risk / Return Rank: 2
JETD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
JETD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
JETD Omega Ratio Rank: 2
JETD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
JETD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

EFZ

EFZ Risk / Return Rank: 3
EFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
EFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
EFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JETD vs. EFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (JETD) and ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JETD	EFZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	-0.87	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.37	-1.18	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	0.87	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.88	-0.84	-0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.48	-1.35	-0.13

JETD vs. EFZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JETD Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is comparable to the EFZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JETD and EFZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JETD vs. EFZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JETD drawdown since its inception was -95.39%, which is greater than EFZ's maximum drawdown of -88.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JETD and EFZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	JETD	EFZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.39%	-88.15%	-7.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-75.34%	-17.60%	-57.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-95.39%	-35.82%	-59.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.64%	-87.93%	-6.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-62.53%	-67.20%	+4.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	44.93%	10.86%	+34.07%

Volatility

JETD vs. EFZ - Volatility Comparison

MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (JETD) has a higher volatility of 16.54% compared to ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) at 4.17%. This indicates that JETD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JETD	EFZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.54%	4.17%	+12.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	64.96%	14.29%	+50.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.94%	16.87%	+58.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.34%	16.84%	+54.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.34%	17.10%	+54.24%

JETD vs. EFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JETD and EFZ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

JETD vs. EFZ - Dividend Comparison

JETD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE	3.97%	4.55%	5.29%	4.66%	0.57%	0.00%	0.04%	1.56%	0.34%
JETD MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JETD and EFZ in my portfolio?

JETD and EFZ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JETD or EFZ?

JETD has higher volatility (16.54%) compared to EFZ (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JETD dropped -95.39% vs EFZ's -88.15%.

Which ETF is better, JETD or EFZ?

On 3-year performance, EFZ leads with -9.25% vs -51.55% for JETD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EFZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JETD or EFZ?

Over the 3-year period, EFZ has performed better with a -9.25% return vs -51.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JETD or EFZ?

JETD and EFZ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JETD or EFZ?

EFZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.00% for JETD.

What is the main difference between JETD and EFZ?

JETD tracks Prime Airlines Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%), while EFZ tracks MSCI EAFE Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Max and ProShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.87 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.