PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JEQP.L vs. NASD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JEQP.L vs. NASD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP (JEQP.L) and Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JEQP.L is traded in GBp, while NASD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NASD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEQP.L achieves a 9.16% return, which is significantly lower than NASD.L's 17.96% return.


JEQP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
1.60%
YTD
9.16%
6M
9.31%
1Y
27.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NASD.L

1D
-0.82%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
17.96%
6M
17.51%
1Y
37.07%
3Y*
24.56%
5Y*
17.13%
10Y*
23.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEQP.L vs. NASD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JEQP.L
JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP
9.16%6.86%-16.74%
NASD.L
Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD
17.96%11.32%8.42%

Correlation

The correlation between JEQP.L and NASD.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024

0.82

The correlation between JEQP.L and NASD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JEQP.L vs. NASD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEQP.L
JEQP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
JEQP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEQP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEQP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
JEQP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEQP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

NASD.L
NASD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
NASD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
NASD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEQP.L vs. NASD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP (JEQP.L) and Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JEQP.LNASD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.39

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.87

3.34

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.29

9.32

+7.98

JEQP.L vs. NASD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEQP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the NASD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEQP.L and NASD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JEQP.L vs. NASD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEQP.L drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than NASD.L's maximum drawdown of -27.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEQP.L and NASD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JEQP.LNASD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.02%

-27.57%

-71.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.64%

-11.03%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-3.23%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.19%

-6.10%

-10.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

3.97%

-2.38%

Volatility

JEQP.L vs. NASD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP (JEQP.L) is 4.79%, while Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that JEQP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JEQP.LNASD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

6.66%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

12.91%

-4.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

16.81%

-4.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6,114.20%

20.89%

+6,093.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6,114.20%

22.01%

+6,092.19%

JEQP.L vs. NASD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEQP.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than NASD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

JEQP.L vs. NASD.L - Dividend Comparison

JEQP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.86%, while NASD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JEQP.L
JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP
8.86%10.25%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NASD.L
Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.66%0.69%0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


JEQP.L and NASD.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NASD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NASD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEQP.L.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JEQP.L and 0.30% for NASD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JEQP.L and NASD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer