PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JEQP.L vs. LQQ.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JEQP.L vs. LQQ.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP (JEQP.L) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JEQP.L is traded in GBp, while LQQ.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LQQ.PA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEQP.L achieves a 8.97% return, which is significantly lower than LQQ.PA's 38.92% return.


JEQP.L

1D
-0.35%
1M
4.24%
YTD
8.97%
6M
8.46%
1Y
29.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LQQ.PA

1D
-1.26%
1M
18.24%
YTD
38.92%
6M
35.53%
1Y
84.02%
3Y*
45.03%
5Y*
27.08%
10Y*
36.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEQP.L vs. LQQ.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JEQP.L and LQQ.PA is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2024

0.78

The correlation between JEQP.L and LQQ.PA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JEQP.L vs. LQQ.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEQP.L
JEQP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
JEQP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEQP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEQP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
JEQP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEQP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

LQQ.PA
LQQ.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LQQ.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQQ.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQQ.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
LQQ.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQQ.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEQP.L vs. LQQ.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP (JEQP.L) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JEQP.LLQQ.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.43

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.23

3.64

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.59

11.08

+8.52

JEQP.L vs. LQQ.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEQP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the LQQ.PA Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEQP.L and LQQ.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JEQP.LLQQ.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.75

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.72

+0.21

Drawdowns

JEQP.L vs. LQQ.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEQP.L drawdown since its inception was -22.00%, smaller than the maximum LQQ.PA drawdown of -69.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEQP.L and LQQ.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JEQP.LLQQ.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.00%

-69.49%

+47.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.64%

-22.74%

+17.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-1.26%

+0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-13.85%

+8.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

7.51%

-6.00%

Volatility

JEQP.L vs. LQQ.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP (JEQP.L) is 1.57%, while Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA) has a volatility of 9.26%. This indicates that JEQP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQQ.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JEQP.LLQQ.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.57%

9.26%

-7.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.83%

21.97%

-14.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.20%

30.10%

-18.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.88%

39.16%

-24.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.88%

38.33%

-23.45%

JEQP.L vs. LQQ.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEQP.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LQQ.PA's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

JEQP.L vs. LQQ.PA - Dividend Comparison

JEQP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.21%, while LQQ.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


JEQP.L and LQQ.PA have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JEQP.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JEQP.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for LQQ.PA.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JEQP.L and 0.60% for LQQ.PA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JEQP.L and LQQ.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer