JEPQ vs. SCYB

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) and SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, while SCYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, JEPQ returned 25.85% vs 6.85% for SCYB. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JEPQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCYB.

Performance

JEPQ vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEPQ achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly higher than SCYB's 1.37% return.

JEPQ

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 0.97%
• YTD: 7.44%
• 6M: 7.26%
• 1Y: 25.85%
• 3Y*: 20.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCYB

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: 1.37%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: 6.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEPQ vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	7.44%	15.18%	24.85%	9.52%
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	1.37%	8.33%	8.15%	6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between JEPQ and SCYB is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023	0.56

The correlation between JEPQ and SCYB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

JEPQ vs. SCYB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JEPQ	SCYB
Technology	54.0%	4.4%
Communication Services	15.4%	8.7%
Consumer Cyclical	12.8%	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	7.1%	2.5%
Healthcare	4.4%	5.7%
Industrials	3.1%	8.9%
Utilities	1.3%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.0%	3.6%
Energy	0.4%	5.8%
Financial Services	0.4%	4.9%
Real Estate	0.2%	4.1%

Return for Risk

JEPQ vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEPQ

JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 73
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 79
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 80

SCYB

SCYB Risk / Return Rank: 66
SCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
SCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 66
SCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEPQ vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JEPQ	SCYB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	1.83	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	2.73	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.36	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	2.82	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.33	12.57	+1.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JEPQ vs. SCYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEPQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the SCYB Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEPQ and SCYB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JEPQ	SCYB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	1.83	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	1.67	-0.70

Drawdowns

JEPQ vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEPQ drawdown since its inception was -20.07%, which is greater than SCYB's maximum drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPQ and SCYB.

Drawdown Indicators

	JEPQ	SCYB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.07%	-4.92%	-15.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.82%	-2.44%	-6.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.02%	-0.50%	-1.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.42%	-0.52%	-2.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	0.55%	+1.26%

Volatility

JEPQ vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) at 1.03%. This indicates that JEPQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JEPQ	SCYB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	1.03%	+2.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.66%	2.97%	+6.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.19%	3.77%	+8.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.67%	5.13%	+11.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.67%	5.13%	+11.54%

JEPQ vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEPQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

JEPQ vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison

JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.26%, more than SCYB's 6.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	10.26%	10.53%	9.65%	10.03%	9.44%
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	6.95%	6.99%	7.06%	3.36%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JEPQ and SCYB in my portfolio?

JEPQ and SCYB have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JEPQ or SCYB?

JEPQ has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to SCYB (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEPQ dropped -20.07% vs SCYB's -4.92%.

Which ETF is better, JEPQ or SCYB?

On 1-year performance, JEPQ leads with 25.85% vs 6.85% for SCYB. On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCYB has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JEPQ or SCYB?

Over the 1-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 25.85% return vs 6.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JEPQ or SCYB?

SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JEPQ or SCYB?

JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.26%, compared with 6.95% for SCYB.

What is the main difference between JEPQ and SCYB?

JEPQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SCYB is High Yield Bonds. JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index, while SCYB tracks ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JEPQ and 0.03% for SCYB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.