JEPQ vs. JBBB

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) and JBBB (Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, while JBBB is a CLO fund actively managed by Janus Henderson. JEPQ is passively managed, while JBBB is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JEPQ returned 19.91%/yr vs 10.46%/yr for JBBB. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JEPQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for JBBB.

Performance

JEPQ vs. JBBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEPQ achieves a 7.85% return, which is significantly higher than JBBB's 2.03% return.

JEPQ

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 7.85%
• 6M: 8.80%
• 1Y: 26.60%
• 3Y*: 19.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JBBB

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 2.03%
• 6M: 2.43%
• 1Y: 5.67%
• 3Y*: 10.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEPQ vs. JBBB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	7.85%	15.18%	24.85%	36.28%	-11.16%
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF	2.03%	5.43%	12.50%	17.63%	-4.84%

Correlation

The correlation between JEPQ and JBBB is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022	0.19

Over the past year, JEPQ and JBBB have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.

JEPQ vs. JBBB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JEPQ	JBBB
Technology	54.0%	-
Communication Services	15.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.1%	-
Healthcare	4.4%	-
Industrials	3.1%	-
Utilities	1.3%	-
Basic Materials	1.0%	-
Energy	0.4%	-
Financial Services	0.4%	4.2%
Real Estate	0.2%	-

Return for Risk

JEPQ vs. JBBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEPQ

JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 74
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 79
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 81

JBBB

JBBB Risk / Return Rank: 56
JBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
JBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
JBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 64
JBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
JBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEPQ vs. JBBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JEPQ	JBBB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	1.58	+0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	2.52	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.34	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	2.21	+0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.84	7.50	+6.34

JEPQ vs. JBBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEPQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the JBBB Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEPQ and JBBB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JEPQ vs. JBBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEPQ drawdown since its inception was -20.07%, which is greater than JBBB's maximum drawdown of -10.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPQ and JBBB.

Drawdown Indicators

	JEPQ	JBBB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.07%	-10.57%	-9.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.82%	-2.46%	-6.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.07%	-3.82%	-16.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.64%	0.00%	-1.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.41%	-1.57%	-1.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	0.72%	+1.13%

Volatility

JEPQ vs. JBBB - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) at 1.02%. This indicates that JEPQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JBBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JEPQ	JBBB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.98%	1.02%	+3.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.22%	2.90%	+7.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.61%	3.45%	+9.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.73%	5.26%	+11.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.73%	5.26%	+11.47%

JEPQ vs. JBBB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEPQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than JBBB's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

JEPQ vs. JBBB - Dividend Comparison

JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.22%, more than JBBB's 7.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF	7.11%	8.41%	9.24%	8.71%	5.71%
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	10.22%	10.53%	9.65%	10.03%	9.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JEPQ and JBBB in my portfolio?

JEPQ and JBBB have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JEPQ or JBBB?

JEPQ has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to JBBB (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEPQ dropped -20.07% vs JBBB's -10.57%.

Which ETF is better, JEPQ or JBBB?

On 3-year performance, JEPQ leads with 19.91% vs 10.46% for JBBB. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JBBB has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JEPQ or JBBB?

Over the 3-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 19.91% return vs 10.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JEPQ or JBBB?

JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JBBB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JEPQ or JBBB?

JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.22%, compared with 7.11% for JBBB.

What is the main difference between JEPQ and JBBB?

JEPQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while JBBB is CLO. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JEPQ and 0.49% for JBBB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.