PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JEPQ vs. IWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JEPQ vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEPQ achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 15.62% return.


JEPQ

1D
1.24%
1M
0.97%
YTD
7.44%
6M
7.26%
1Y
25.85%
3Y*
20.04%
5Y*
10Y*

IWM

1D
0.87%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
15.62%
6M
13.83%
1Y
35.52%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
10.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEPQ vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
7.44%15.18%24.85%36.28%-12.89%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
15.62%12.66%11.38%16.83%-8.78%

Correlation

The correlation between JEPQ and IWM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022

0.70

The correlation between JEPQ and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

JEPQ vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JEPQ
IWM

Technology

54.0%
19.5%

Communication Services

15.4%
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
2.1%

Healthcare

4.4%
16.1%

Industrials

3.1%
17.2%

Utilities

1.3%
3.0%

Basic Materials

1.0%
4.5%

Energy

0.4%
5.8%

Financial Services

0.4%
15.6%

Real Estate

0.2%
5.6%

Technology

JEPQ
54.0%
IWM
19.5%

Communication Services

JEPQ
15.4%
IWM
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

JEPQ
12.8%
IWM
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

JEPQ
7.1%
IWM
2.1%

Healthcare

JEPQ
4.4%
IWM
16.1%

Industrials

JEPQ
3.1%
IWM
17.2%

Utilities

JEPQ
1.3%
IWM
3.0%

Basic Materials

JEPQ
1.0%
IWM
4.5%

Energy

JEPQ
0.4%
IWM
5.8%

Financial Services

JEPQ
0.4%
IWM
15.6%

Real Estate

JEPQ
0.2%
IWM
5.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JEPQ vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEPQ
JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEPQ vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JEPQIWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.30

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

3.24

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.33

11.44

+2.89

JEPQ vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEPQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEPQ and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JEPQIWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.83

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.36

+0.60

Drawdowns

JEPQ vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEPQ drawdown since its inception was -20.07%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPQ and IWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JEPQIWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.07%

-59.05%

+38.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-11.03%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.07%

-27.50%

+7.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.02%

-2.71%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-10.76%

+7.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

3.11%

-1.30%

Volatility

JEPQ vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) is 3.65%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that JEPQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JEPQIWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

6.52%

-2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.66%

14.00%

-4.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

19.53%

-7.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.67%

22.58%

-5.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

23.07%

-6.40%

JEPQ vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEPQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

JEPQ vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.26%, more than IWM's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.89%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
10.26%10.53%9.65%10.03%9.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JEPQ and IWM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWM has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to JEPQ (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEPQ dropped -20.07% vs IWM's -59.05%.

On 3-year performance, JEPQ leads with 20.04% vs 16.64% for IWM. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 20.04% return vs 16.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.

JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.26%, compared with 0.89% for IWM.

JEPQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JEPQ and 0.19% for IWM.

JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JEPQ and IWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer