JEPQ.TO vs. GLCC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JEPQ.TO (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF) and GLCC.TO (Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JEPQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while GLCC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JEPQ.TO returned 31.41% vs 60.20% for GLCC.TO. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JEPQ.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for GLCC.TO.

Performance

JEPQ.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEPQ.TO achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly higher than GLCC.TO's -0.45% return.

JEPQ.TO

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 6.30%
• YTD: 11.09%
• 6M: 9.59%
• 1Y: 31.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLCC.TO

• 1D: -2.75%
• 1M: 1.61%
• YTD: -0.45%
• 6M: 4.96%
• 1Y: 60.20%
• 3Y*: 40.99%
• 5Y*: 21.30%
• 10Y*: 14.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEPQ.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JEPQ.TO JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF	11.09%	10.46%	15.40%
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	-0.45%	137.43%	-9.25%

Correlation

The correlation between JEPQ.TO and GLCC.TO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024	0.10

JEPQ.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JEPQ.TO	GLCC.TO
Technology	54.0%	-
Communication Services	15.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.1%	-
Healthcare	4.4%	-
Industrials	3.0%	-
Utilities	1.2%	-
Basic Materials	1.0%	100.0%
Energy	0.4%	-
Financial Services	0.4%	-
Real Estate	0.2%	-

Return for Risk

JEPQ.TO vs. GLCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEPQ.TO

JEPQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 78
JEPQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
JEPQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
JEPQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
JEPQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
JEPQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

GLCC.TO

GLCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 39
GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
GLCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GLCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 40
GLCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
GLCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEPQ.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JEPQ.TO	GLCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	1.45	+1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	1.86	+1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.27	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.08	2.10	+1.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.30	5.69	+10.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JEPQ.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEPQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEPQ.TO and GLCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JEPQ.TO	GLCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.51	1.45	+1.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.34	0.00	+1.34

Drawdowns

JEPQ.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEPQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.05%, smaller than the maximum GLCC.TO drawdown of -71.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPQ.TO and GLCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	JEPQ.TO	GLCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.05%	-71.12%	+51.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.74%	-28.86%	+21.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.86%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.60%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-23.43%	+23.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.36%	-34.43%	+31.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	10.61%	-8.68%

Volatility

JEPQ.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO) is 4.05%, while Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) has a volatility of 14.96%. This indicates that JEPQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JEPQ.TO	GLCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	14.96%	-10.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.88%	34.13%	-24.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.58%	41.70%	-29.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.35%	31.94%	-14.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.35%	31.95%	-14.60%

JEPQ.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEPQ.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GLCC.TO's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

JEPQ.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

JEPQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.00%, more than GLCC.TO's 8.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	8.69%	6.01%	10.30%	11.16%	10.08%	6.31%	6.47%	4.58%	5.62%	7.09%	9.21%	11.63%
JEPQ.TO JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF	10.00%	10.34%	5.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JEPQ.TO and GLCC.TO in my portfolio?

JEPQ.TO and GLCC.TO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JEPQ.TO or GLCC.TO?

On fees, JEPQ.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JEPQ.TO or GLCC.TO?

JEPQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for GLCC.TO.

What is the main difference between JEPQ.TO and GLCC.TO?

JEPQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while GLCC.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JEPQ.TO and 0.79% for GLCC.TO.