JEPI.TO vs. DXQ.TO
JEPI.TO (JPMorgan US Equity Premium Income Active ETF) and DXQ.TO (Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JEPI.TO returned 9.33% vs 19.04% for DXQ.TO. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JEPI.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for DXQ.TO.
Performance
JEPI.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEPI.TO achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than DXQ.TO's 6.80% return.
JEPI.TO
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 9.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DXQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 6.80%
- 6M
- 5.77%
- 1Y
- 19.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEPI.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JEPI.TO JPMorgan US Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 1.48% | 3.09% | 7.35% |
DXQ.TO Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF | 6.80% | 12.99% | 8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between JEPI.TO and DXQ.TO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.53 |
The correlation between JEPI.TO and DXQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JEPI.TO vs. DXQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
JEPI.TO
DXQ.TO
JEPI.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan US Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPI.TO) and Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JEPI.TO | DXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.40 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 3.74 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.49 | 10.46 | -5.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JEPI.TO | DXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 2.08 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 1.61 | -1.05 |
Drawdowns
JEPI.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEPI.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum DXQ.TO drawdown of -15.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPI.TO and DXQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEPI.TO | DXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | -15.54% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.32% | -5.11% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.06% | -0.70% | -2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.38% | -1.27% | -2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 1.82% | +0.26% |
Volatility
JEPI.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan US Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPI.TO) is 2.14%, while Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO) has a volatility of 2.38%. This indicates that JEPI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JEPI.TO | DXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 2.38% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | 7.14% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.92% | 9.21% | +0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.92% | 10.92% | +2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.92% | 10.92% | +2.00% |
JEPI.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
JEPI.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DXQ.TO's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
JEPI.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
JEPI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.90%, more than DXQ.TO's 7.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXQ.TO Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF | 7.77% | 7.45% | 5.74% | 6.54% | 1.83% |
JEPI.TO JPMorgan US Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 7.90% | 7.56% | 3.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JEPI.TO and DXQ.TO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JEPI.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JEPI.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for DXQ.TO.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Dynamic. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JEPI.TO and 0.72% for DXQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for JEPI.TO and DXQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer