JENSX vs. GTLLX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JENSX (Jensen Quality Growth Fund) and GTLLX (Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio) are both mutual funds - JENSX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Jensen, while GTLLX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Glenmede. Over the past 10 years, JENSX returned 9.21%/yr vs 16.67%/yr for GTLLX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JENSX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GTLLX.

Performance

JENSX vs. GTLLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jensen Quality Growth Fund (JENSX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JENSX achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly lower than GTLLX's 21.72% return. Over the past 10 years, JENSX has underperformed GTLLX with an annualized return of 9.21%, while GTLLX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.67% annualized return.

JENSX

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 3.05%
• YTD: -0.07%
• 6M: -0.45%
• 1Y: 2.78%
• 3Y*: 3.90%
• 5Y*: 3.99%
• 10Y*: 9.21%

GTLLX

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 13.54%
• YTD: 21.72%
• 6M: 22.60%
• 1Y: 39.47%
• 3Y*: 25.88%
• 5Y*: 15.11%
• 10Y*: 16.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JENSX vs. GTLLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JENSX Jensen Quality Growth Fund	-0.07%	4.46%	-1.03%	16.60%	-16.58%	30.32%	8.24%	29.02%	2.01%	23.21%
GTLLX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio	21.72%	17.44%	20.71%	27.10%	-21.69%	32.91%	18.80%	34.86%	-5.23%	27.83%

Correlation

The correlation between JENSX and GTLLX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005	0.87

The correlation between JENSX and GTLLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JENSX vs. GTLLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JENSX

JENSX Risk / Return Rank: 4
JENSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
JENSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
JENSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
JENSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
JENSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

GTLLX

GTLLX Risk / Return Rank: 70
GTLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
GTLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
GTLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
GTLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
GTLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JENSX vs. GTLLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jensen Quality Growth Fund (JENSX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JENSX	GTLLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.26	2.44	-2.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.44	3.29	-2.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.41	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	3.85	-3.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.70	15.80	-15.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JENSX vs. GTLLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JENSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the GTLLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JENSX and GTLLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JENSX	GTLLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26	2.44	-2.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	0.52	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.67	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.55	-0.03

Drawdowns

JENSX vs. GTLLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JENSX drawdown since its inception was -45.54%, smaller than the maximum GTLLX drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JENSX and GTLLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JENSX	GTLLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.54%	-54.32%	+8.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.74%	-10.76%	-3.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.85%	-41.54%	+18.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.81%	-41.54%	+17.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.72%	-41.54%	+10.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.44%	0.00%	-9.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.26%	-8.58%	+2.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.26%	2.61%	+1.65%

Volatility

JENSX vs. GTLLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Jensen Quality Growth Fund (JENSX) is 2.52%, while Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that JENSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTLLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JENSX	GTLLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.52%	4.98%	-2.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.24%	13.32%	-4.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.63%	16.99%	-5.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.99%	29.00%	-13.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.14%	25.00%	-7.86%

JENSX vs. GTLLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JENSX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than GTLLX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

JENSX vs. GTLLX - Dividend Comparison

JENSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.55%, more than GTLLX's 12.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GTLLX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio	12.59%	15.33%	40.42%	4.91%	7.93%	20.20%	15.12%	14.10%	16.97%	2.29%	0.58%	0.61%
JENSX Jensen Quality Growth Fund	38.55%	38.59%	0.64%	7.82%	3.02%	6.69%	0.94%	8.12%	10.12%	3.24%	4.62%	11.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JENSX and GTLLX in my portfolio?

JENSX and GTLLX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JENSX or GTLLX?

GTLLX has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to JENSX (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JENSX dropped -45.54% vs GTLLX's -54.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTLLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.