PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JEMWX vs. EMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JEMWX vs. EMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 (JEMWX) and Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEMWX achieves a 23.84% return, which is significantly lower than EMF's 32.25% return. Over the past 10 years, JEMWX has underperformed EMF with an annualized return of 10.70%, while EMF has yielded a comparatively higher 14.07% annualized return.


JEMWX

1D
-3.96%
1M
-2.99%
6M
17.66%
YTD
23.84%
1Y
49.22%
3Y*
20.86%
5Y*
4.94%
10Y*
10.70%

EMF

1D
0.73%
1M
-5.78%
6M
22.67%
YTD
32.25%
1Y
62.61%
3Y*
30.99%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
14.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEMWX vs. EMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JEMWX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6
23.84%40.40%3.61%7.42%-25.61%-10.20%35.00%32.20%-15.82%42.84%
EMF
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund
32.25%58.20%6.56%8.84%-21.53%-8.23%24.48%27.20%-14.78%53.55%

Correlation

The correlation between JEMWX and EMF is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.81

The correlation between JEMWX and EMF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JEMWX vs. EMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEMWX
JEMWX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
JEMWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEMWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEMWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
JEMWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEMWX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

EMF
EMF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEMWX vs. EMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 (JEMWX) and Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JEMWXEMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.44

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

3.23

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.28

11.85

+2.42

JEMWX vs. EMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEMWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the EMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEMWX and EMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JEMWX vs. EMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEMWX drawdown since its inception was -49.42%, smaller than the maximum EMF drawdown of -76.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMWX and EMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JEMWXEMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.42%

-76.97%

+27.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.55%

-19.48%

+6.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.01%

-19.48%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.28%

-42.64%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.42%

-47.65%

-1.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.24%

-9.86%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

-28.93%

+11.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

5.30%

-1.86%

Volatility

JEMWX vs. EMF - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 (JEMWX) has a higher volatility of 11.96% compared to Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF) at 10.50%. This indicates that JEMWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JEMWXEMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.96%

10.50%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.23%

22.63%

-1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.66%

25.32%

-1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.12%

21.10%

-0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.76%

20.75%

-0.99%

JEMWX vs. EMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEMWX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than EMF's 1.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

JEMWX vs. EMF - Dividend Comparison

JEMWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than EMF's 7.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMF
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund
7.61%9.73%4.28%6.22%9.89%6.92%3.51%7.36%5.92%12.11%1.62%12.81%
JEMWX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6
1.15%1.42%1.63%1.67%0.67%4.01%0.18%0.88%1.05%0.55%0.89%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


JEMWX and EMF have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JEMWX has higher volatility (11.96%) compared to EMF (10.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMWX dropped -49.42% vs EMF's -76.97%.

EMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JEMWX and EMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer