PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JEMUX vs. FASPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JEMUX vs. FASPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Mid Value Trust (JEMUX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEMUX achieves a 14.76% return, which is significantly lower than FASPX's 20.91% return.


JEMUX

1D
-0.37%
1M
2.09%
YTD
14.76%
6M
14.15%
1Y
26.34%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
10.02%
10Y*

FASPX

1D
0.13%
1M
2.31%
YTD
20.91%
6M
22.01%
1Y
40.34%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
7.81%
10Y*
10.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEMUX vs. FASPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JEMUX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Mid Value Trust
14.76%6.04%16.23%18.67%-4.01%24.30%9.50%19.52%-11.45%-0.17%
FASPX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M
20.91%7.76%-2.60%19.93%-7.82%32.65%7.70%33.85%-17.27%14.16%

Correlation

The correlation between JEMUX and FASPX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.92

The correlation between JEMUX and FASPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JEMUX vs. FASPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEMUX
JEMUX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
JEMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
JEMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FASPX
FASPX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FASPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FASPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEMUX vs. FASPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Mid Value Trust (JEMUX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JEMUXFASPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.40

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

4.06

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.55

15.00

-3.45

JEMUX vs. FASPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEMUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the FASPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEMUX and FASPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JEMUXFASPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.37

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.38

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.41

+0.08

Drawdowns

JEMUX vs. FASPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEMUX drawdown since its inception was -39.41%, smaller than the maximum FASPX drawdown of -70.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMUX and FASPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JEMUXFASPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.41%

-70.11%

+30.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.60%

-9.84%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.96%

-34.53%

+12.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.96%

-34.53%

+12.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

0.00%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-9.83%

+4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

2.66%

-0.20%

Volatility

JEMUX vs. FASPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Mid Value Trust (JEMUX) is 3.57%, while Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that JEMUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JEMUXFASPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

4.09%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.62%

11.91%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.82%

16.98%

-2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.99%

20.68%

-2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.63%

22.00%

-2.37%

JEMUX vs. FASPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEMUX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than FASPX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

JEMUX vs. FASPX - Dividend Comparison

JEMUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.73%, more than FASPX's 7.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASPX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M
7.71%9.32%0.00%2.40%1.93%7.80%0.55%4.98%15.67%7.26%21.61%0.80%
JEMUX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Mid Value Trust
19.73%22.65%5.67%16.50%14.45%5.72%3.65%15.29%10.03%0.58%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JEMUX and FASPX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FASPX has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to JEMUX (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMUX dropped -39.41% vs FASPX's -70.11%.

FASPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JEMUX and FASPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer