PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JEMSX vs. FEMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JEMSX vs. FEMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JEMSX having a 30.43% return and FEMSX slightly lower at 30.34%. Over the past 10 years, JEMSX has underperformed FEMSX with an annualized return of 11.60%, while FEMSX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.07% annualized return.


JEMSX

1D
-1.06%
1M
2.90%
YTD
30.43%
6M
33.41%
1Y
60.96%
3Y*
25.06%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
11.60%

FEMSX

1D
-1.35%
1M
2.55%
YTD
30.34%
6M
33.71%
1Y
59.87%
3Y*
27.65%
5Y*
8.09%
10Y*
13.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEMSX vs. FEMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JEMSX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I
30.43%40.13%3.39%7.21%-25.77%-10.36%34.73%31.96%-16.02%42.49%
FEMSX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
30.34%37.92%7.84%14.23%-23.95%-5.14%24.72%28.87%-16.20%49.92%

Correlation

The correlation between JEMSX and FEMSX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2008

0.94

The correlation between JEMSX and FEMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JEMSX vs. FEMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEMSX
JEMSX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
JEMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
JEMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FEMSX
FEMSX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FEMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEMSX vs. FEMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JEMSXFEMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.59

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.99

4.57

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.86

18.19

+2.66

JEMSX vs. FEMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEMSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is comparable to the FEMSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEMSX and FEMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JEMSXFEMSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23

3.22

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.43

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.68

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.56

-0.26

Drawdowns

JEMSX vs. FEMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEMSX drawdown since its inception was -62.07%, which is greater than FEMSX's maximum drawdown of -44.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMSX and FEMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JEMSXFEMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.07%

-44.16%

-17.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.57%

-13.42%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.10%

-17.04%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.92%

-41.64%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.59%

-44.16%

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-2.49%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.68%

-13.40%

-8.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

3.36%

-0.36%

Volatility

JEMSX vs. FEMSX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) have volatilities of 8.16% and 8.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JEMSXFEMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.16%

8.24%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.32%

16.54%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.45%

19.06%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.25%

19.04%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.44%

19.34%

+0.10%

JEMSX vs. FEMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEMSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMSX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

JEMSX vs. FEMSX - Dividend Comparison

JEMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than FEMSX's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEMSX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
1.88%2.45%2.08%2.82%2.39%12.83%2.99%2.48%9.42%8.98%1.46%1.27%
JEMSX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I
0.96%1.26%1.41%1.45%0.37%3.80%0.09%0.76%0.87%0.39%0.66%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, JEMSX and FEMSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FEMSX has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to JEMSX (8.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMSX dropped -62.07% vs FEMSX's -44.16%.

JEMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 3.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JEMSX and FEMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer