PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JEMDX vs. MMHVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JEMDX vs. MMHVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund (JEMDX) and MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JEMDX having a 3.22% return and MMHVX slightly lower at 3.14%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JEMDX having a 3.30% annualized return and MMHVX not far behind at 3.17%.


JEMDX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.63%
YTD
3.22%
6M
3.54%
1Y
14.49%
3Y*
10.61%
5Y*
1.97%
10Y*
3.30%

MMHVX

1D
0.08%
1M
2.41%
YTD
3.14%
6M
3.60%
1Y
9.01%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
1.08%
10Y*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEMDX vs. MMHVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JEMDX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund
3.22%13.87%7.37%10.17%-18.60%-3.22%5.37%13.86%-5.82%10.25%
MMHVX
MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
3.14%4.27%4.24%8.60%-14.42%6.12%5.18%9.18%4.06%8.60%

Correlation

The correlation between JEMDX and MMHVX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2010

0.26

Over the past year, JEMDX and MMHVX have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JEMDX vs. MMHVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEMDX
JEMDX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
JEMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
JEMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

MMHVX
MMHVX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MMHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
MMHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEMDX vs. MMHVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund (JEMDX) and MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JEMDXMMHVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.61

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.92

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.73

10.25

+1.47

JEMDX vs. MMHVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEMDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is comparable to the MMHVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEMDX and MMHVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JEMDX vs. MMHVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEMDX drawdown since its inception was -38.84%, which is greater than MMHVX's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMDX and MMHVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JEMDXMMHVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.84%

-20.86%

-17.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.14%

-3.11%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.10%

-8.16%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.83%

-20.86%

-9.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.83%

-20.86%

-9.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

0.00%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.08%

-3.19%

-2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

0.88%

+0.34%

Volatility

JEMDX vs. MMHVX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund (JEMDX) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX) at 0.96%. This indicates that JEMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMHVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JEMDXMMHVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

0.96%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.05%

2.57%

+1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.78%

3.56%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.92%

5.66%

+1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.14%

5.33%

+1.81%

JEMDX vs. MMHVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEMDX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than MMHVX's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

JEMDX vs. MMHVX - Dividend Comparison

JEMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, more than MMHVX's 3.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JEMDX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund
5.83%5.61%6.13%5.47%6.15%4.38%3.71%4.52%4.64%4.43%5.06%4.76%
MMHVX
MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
3.96%5.31%3.98%3.28%3.47%2.71%3.32%3.83%3.91%3.92%4.20%4.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


JEMDX and MMHVX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JEMDX has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to MMHVX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMDX dropped -38.84% vs MMHVX's -20.86%.

JEMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JEMDX and MMHVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer