JEMB vs. VUSV
JEMB (Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF) and VUSV (Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JEMB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while VUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JEMB charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VUSV.
Performance
JEMB vs. VUSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEMB achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly lower than VUSV's 8.98% return.
JEMB
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 2.72%
- 6M
- 3.66%
- 1Y
- 12.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUSV
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 10.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEMB vs. VUSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JEMB Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF | 2.72% | 1.32% |
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF | 8.98% | 5.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between JEMB and VUSV is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JEMB vs. VUSV — Risk / Return Rank
JEMB
VUSV
JEMB vs. VUSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (JEMB) and Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JEMB | VUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.47 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JEMB | VUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 2.48 | -1.23 |
Drawdowns
JEMB vs. VUSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEMB drawdown since its inception was -5.37%, smaller than the maximum VUSV drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMB and VUSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEMB | VUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.37% | -7.06% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | 0.00% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.01% | -1.30% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | — | — |
Volatility
JEMB vs. VUSV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JEMB | VUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.98% | 12.03% | -4.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.51% | 12.03% | -3.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.51% | 12.03% | -3.52% |
JEMB vs. VUSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
JEMB has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than VUSV's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
JEMB vs. VUSV - Dividend Comparison
JEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than VUSV's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEMB Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF | 6.27% | 6.19% | 2.53% |
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JEMB and VUSV have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUSV is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUSV is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for JEMB.
JEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 0.18% for VUSV.
JEMB is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while VUSV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for JEMB and 0.30% for VUSV.
Find the right allocation for JEMB and VUSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer