PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JEMA vs. JPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JEMA vs. JPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) and J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEMA achieves a 31.42% return, which is significantly higher than JPEM's 7.19% return.


JEMA

1D
-1.10%
1M
9.00%
YTD
31.42%
6M
33.11%
1Y
63.06%
3Y*
24.84%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*

JPEM

1D
-1.27%
1M
0.82%
YTD
7.19%
6M
8.77%
1Y
22.34%
3Y*
13.77%
5Y*
6.03%
10Y*
8.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEMA vs. JPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JEMA
JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
31.42%34.89%5.68%9.82%-24.98%-4.78%
JPEM
J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF
7.19%22.90%4.23%11.01%-9.03%2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between JEMA and JPEM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2021

0.87

The correlation between JEMA and JPEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

JEMA vs. JPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JEMA
JPEM

Technology

41.1%
6.7%

Financial Services

21.2%
19.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
10.0%

Industrials

7.4%
13.1%

Communication Services

7.0%
8.4%

Energy

4.0%
7.5%

Basic Materials

3.5%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
8.6%

Healthcare

1.7%
4.3%

Utilities

1.4%
9.2%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.8%

Technology

JEMA
41.1%
JPEM
6.7%

Financial Services

JEMA
21.2%
JPEM
19.1%

Consumer Cyclical

JEMA
9.6%
JPEM
10.0%

Industrials

JEMA
7.4%
JPEM
13.1%

Communication Services

JEMA
7.0%
JPEM
8.4%

Energy

JEMA
4.0%
JPEM
7.5%

Basic Materials

JEMA
3.5%
JPEM
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

JEMA
2.5%
JPEM
8.6%

Healthcare

JEMA
1.7%
JPEM
4.3%

Utilities

JEMA
1.4%
JPEM
9.2%

Real Estate

JEMA
0.6%
JPEM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JEMA vs. JPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEMA
JEMA Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
JEMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEMA Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
JEMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEMA Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

JPEM
JPEM Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
JPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
JPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEMA vs. JPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) and J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JEMAJPEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.14

1.73

+1.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.92

2.40

+1.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.32

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.84

2.17

+2.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.80

8.14

+11.66

JEMA vs. JPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEMA Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is higher than the JPEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEMA and JPEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JEMAJPEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14

1.73

+1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.45

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.33

+0.08

Drawdowns

JEMA vs. JPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEMA drawdown since its inception was -39.50%, roughly equal to the maximum JPEM drawdown of -40.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMA and JPEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JEMAJPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.50%

-40.22%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.11%

-10.32%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.11%

-14.30%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.45%

-21.57%

-17.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-3.08%

+1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.04%

-9.47%

-7.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

2.75%

+0.44%

Volatility

JEMA vs. JPEM - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM) at 4.59%. This indicates that JEMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JEMAJPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.36%

4.59%

+3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.54%

11.23%

+6.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.20%

12.96%

+7.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.02%

13.49%

+5.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.90%

17.04%

+1.86%

JEMA vs. JPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEMA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than JPEM's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

JEMA vs. JPEM - Dividend Comparison

JEMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than JPEM's 4.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JEMA
JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.23%2.93%2.44%2.95%2.69%1.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPEM
J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF
4.40%4.65%5.12%4.46%4.71%4.40%2.85%3.47%2.79%2.14%1.28%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


JEMA and JPEM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JEMA has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to JPEM (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMA dropped -39.50% vs JPEM's -40.22%.

On 5-year performance, JEMA leads with 7.20% vs 6.03% for JPEM. On fees, JEMA is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, JPEM has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JEMA has performed better with a 7.20% return vs 6.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JEMA is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for JPEM.

JPEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 2.23% for JEMA.

Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JEMA and 0.44% for JPEM.

JEMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JEMA and JPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer