JEMA vs. FRDM
JEMA (JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and FRDM (Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JEMA is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while FRDM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the Life + Liberty Freedom 100 Emerging Markets Index. JEMA is actively managed, while FRDM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JEMA returned 7.20%/yr vs 19.30%/yr for FRDM. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JEMA charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FRDM.
Performance
JEMA vs. FRDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEMA achieves a 31.42% return, which is significantly lower than FRDM's 44.61% return.
JEMA
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- 31.42%
- 6M
- 33.11%
- 1Y
- 63.06%
- 3Y*
- 24.84%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- —
FRDM
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 17.06%
- YTD
- 44.61%
- 6M
- 53.16%
- 1Y
- 97.46%
- 3Y*
- 37.08%
- 5Y*
- 19.30%
- 10Y*
- —
JEMA vs. FRDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEMA JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 31.42% | 34.89% | 5.68% | 9.82% | -24.98% | -4.78% |
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF | 44.61% | 61.27% | 1.70% | 22.77% | -14.45% | -0.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between JEMA and FRDM is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2021 | 0.85 |
The correlation between JEMA and FRDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
JEMA vs. FRDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JEMA
FRDM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
JEMA
FRDM
Financial Services
JEMA
FRDM
Consumer Cyclical
JEMA
FRDM
Industrials
JEMA
FRDM
Communication Services
JEMA
FRDM
Energy
JEMA
FRDM
Basic Materials
JEMA
FRDM
Consumer Defensive
JEMA
FRDM
Healthcare
JEMA
FRDM
Utilities
JEMA
FRDM
Real Estate
JEMA
FRDM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JEMA vs. FRDM — Risk / Return Rank
JEMA
FRDM
JEMA vs. FRDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JEMA | FRDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.14 | 4.00 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.92 | 4.65 | -0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.67 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.84 | 5.81 | -0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.80 | 23.37 | -3.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JEMA | FRDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.14 | 4.00 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.93 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.85 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
JEMA vs. FRDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEMA drawdown since its inception was -39.50%, roughly equal to the maximum FRDM drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMA and FRDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEMA | FRDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.50% | -40.49% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.11% | -16.87% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.11% | -16.87% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.45% | -29.25% | -10.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -1.30% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.04% | -7.09% | -9.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 4.18% | -0.99% |
Volatility
JEMA vs. FRDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) is 8.36%, while Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) has a volatility of 11.03%. This indicates that JEMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JEMA | FRDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.36% | 11.03% | -2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.54% | 21.65% | -4.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.20% | 24.50% | -4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 20.80% | -1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 22.77% | -3.87% |
JEMA vs. FRDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
JEMA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FRDM's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
JEMA vs. FRDM - Dividend Comparison
JEMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than FRDM's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF | 1.51% | 2.26% | 2.53% | 2.66% | 2.72% | 2.17% | 1.11% | 1.07% |
JEMA JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.23% | 2.93% | 2.44% | 2.95% | 2.69% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, JEMA and FRDM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FRDM has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to JEMA (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMA dropped -39.50% vs FRDM's -40.49%.
On 5-year performance, FRDM leads with 19.30% vs 7.20% for JEMA. On fees, JEMA is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, JEMA has been the lower-risk option at 8.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FRDM has performed better with a 19.30% return vs 7.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JEMA is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FRDM.
JEMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 1.51% for FRDM.
JEMA is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FRDM is Emerging Markets Diversified. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Freedom Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JEMA and 0.49% for FRDM.
FRDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 3.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JEMA and FRDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer