JEMA vs. EMCS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JEMA (JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and EMCS (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. JEMA is actively managed, while EMCS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JEMA returned 7.20%/yr vs 7.95%/yr for EMCS. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JEMA charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EMCS.

Performance

JEMA vs. EMCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEMA achieves a 31.42% return, which is significantly lower than EMCS's 33.83% return.

JEMA

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: 9.00%
• YTD: 31.42%
• 6M: 33.11%
• 1Y: 63.06%
• 3Y*: 24.84%
• 5Y*: 7.20%
• 10Y*: —

EMCS

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: 13.15%
• YTD: 33.83%
• 6M: 37.78%
• 1Y: 64.32%
• 3Y*: 27.65%
• 5Y*: 7.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEMA vs. EMCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JEMA JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	31.42%	34.89%	5.68%	9.82%	-24.98%	-4.78%
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF	33.83%	38.71%	10.12%	5.68%	-23.58%	-10.39%

Correlation

The correlation between JEMA and EMCS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2021	0.96

The correlation between JEMA and EMCS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

JEMA vs. EMCS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JEMA	EMCS
Technology	41.1%	44.5%
Financial Services	21.2%	29.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	9.1%
Industrials	7.4%	2.5%
Communication Services	7.0%	8.4%
Energy	4.0%	1.6%
Basic Materials	3.5%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	0.0%
Healthcare	1.7%	0.0%
Utilities	1.4%	0.8%
Real Estate	0.6%	1.0%

Return for Risk

JEMA vs. EMCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEMA

JEMA Risk / Return Rank: 88
JEMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
JEMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
JEMA Omega Ratio Rank: 89
JEMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
JEMA Martin Ratio Rank: 89

EMCS

EMCS Risk / Return Rank: 85
EMCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
EMCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
EMCS Omega Ratio Rank: 85
EMCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
EMCS Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEMA vs. EMCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JEMA	EMCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.14	2.89	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	3.70	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.52	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.84	4.51	+0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.80	17.47	+2.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JEMA vs. EMCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEMA Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is comparable to the EMCS Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEMA and EMCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JEMA	EMCS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.14	2.89	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.39	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.55	-0.14

Drawdowns

JEMA vs. EMCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEMA drawdown since its inception was -39.50%, smaller than the maximum EMCS drawdown of -44.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMA and EMCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	JEMA	EMCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.50%	-44.86%	+5.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.11%	-14.32%	+1.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.11%	-16.73%	-1.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.45%	-42.06%	+2.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.10%	-1.20%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.04%	-16.61%	-0.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	3.69%	-0.50%

Volatility

JEMA vs. EMCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) is 8.36%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that JEMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JEMA	EMCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.36%	9.86%	-1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.54%	19.42%	-1.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.20%	22.37%	-2.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.02%	20.62%	-1.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.90%	21.65%	-2.75%

JEMA vs. EMCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEMA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than EMCS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

JEMA vs. EMCS - Dividend Comparison

JEMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than EMCS's 1.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF	1.24%	1.66%	0.67%	3.07%	2.26%	1.46%	1.40%	3.56%
JEMA JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	2.23%	2.93%	2.44%	2.95%	2.69%	1.54%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JEMA and EMCS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, JEMA and EMCS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JEMA or EMCS?

EMCS has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to JEMA (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMA dropped -39.50% vs EMCS's -44.86%.

Which ETF is better, JEMA or EMCS?

On 5-year performance, EMCS leads with 7.95% vs 7.20% for JEMA. On fees, EMCS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, JEMA has been the lower-risk option at 8.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JEMA or EMCS?

Over the 5-year period, EMCS has performed better with a 7.95% return vs 7.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JEMA or EMCS?

EMCS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JEMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JEMA or EMCS?

JEMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 1.24% for EMCS.

What is the main difference between JEMA and EMCS?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JEMA and 0.15% for EMCS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JEMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.