JELGX vs. GRSPX
JELGX (John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Growth Portfolio) and GRSPX (Greenspring Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, JELGX returned 5.86%/yr vs 10.22%/yr for GRSPX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JELGX charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for GRSPX.
Performance
JELGX vs. GRSPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JELGX achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly lower than GRSPX's 21.71% return. Over the past 10 years, JELGX has underperformed GRSPX with an annualized return of 5.86%, while GRSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.22% annualized return.
JELGX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- 15.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.78%
- 10Y*
- 5.86%
GRSPX
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 21.71%
- YTD
- 21.71%
- 1Y
- 23.14%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
JELGX vs. GRSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JELGX John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Growth Portfolio | 7.16% | 10.85% | 11.92% | 13.80% | -14.85% | 12.82% | -1.50% | 19.53% | -6.56% | 12.01% |
GRSPX Greenspring Fund | 21.71% | 6.12% | 15.53% | 11.95% | -8.62% | 26.89% | 3.81% | 20.84% | -10.21% | 7.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between JELGX and GRSPX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 1997 | 0.79 |
The correlation between JELGX and GRSPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JELGX vs. GRSPX — Risk / Return Rank
JELGX
GRSPX
JELGX vs. GRSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Growth Portfolio (JELGX) and Greenspring Fund (GRSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JELGX | GRSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.32 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 0.86 | +1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.88 | 8.19 | +0.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JELGX vs. GRSPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JELGX drawdown since its inception was -58.74%, which is greater than GRSPX's maximum drawdown of -35.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JELGX and GRSPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JELGX | GRSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.74% | -35.67% | -23.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.91% | -30.41% | +22.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.77% | -30.41% | +17.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.68% | -30.41% | +11.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.45% | -35.07% | +13.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -1.49% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.36% | -4.81% | -11.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 3.07% | -1.18% |
Volatility
JELGX vs. GRSPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Growth Portfolio (JELGX) is 4.48%, while Greenspring Fund (GRSPX) has a volatility of 50.76%. This indicates that JELGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JELGX | GRSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 50.76% | -46.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.99% | 51.00% | -42.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.21% | 56.35% | -45.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.77% | 28.17% | -17.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.58% | 22.51% | -11.93% |
JELGX vs. GRSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JELGX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than GRSPX's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
JELGX vs. GRSPX - Dividend Comparison
JELGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.66%, which matches GRSPX's 7.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRSPX Greenspring Fund | 7.73% | 9.40% | 6.70% | 6.84% | 8.04% | 7.69% | 2.39% | 7.89% | 11.05% | 9.63% | 6.81% | 5.34% |
JELGX John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Growth Portfolio | 7.66% | 8.21% | 2.68% | 15.02% | 4.73% | 2.20% | 8.29% | 9.21% | 12.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JELGX and GRSPX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRSPX has higher volatility (50.76%) compared to JELGX (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JELGX dropped -58.74% vs GRSPX's -35.67%.
JELGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JELGX and GRSPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer