PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JELGX vs. ASFYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JELGX vs. ASFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Growth Portfolio (JELGX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JELGX achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly lower than ASFYX's 8.40% return. Over the past 10 years, JELGX has outperformed ASFYX with an annualized return of 5.85%, while ASFYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.06% annualized return.


JELGX

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.79%
6M
6.44%
YTD
7.08%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
12.00%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
5.85%

ASFYX

1D
-0.47%
1M
-5.94%
6M
7.29%
YTD
8.40%
1Y
18.15%
3Y*
-4.05%
5Y*
2.04%
10Y*
2.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JELGX vs. ASFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JELGX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Growth Portfolio
7.08%10.85%11.92%13.80%-14.85%12.82%-1.50%19.53%-6.56%12.01%
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
8.40%-9.67%-3.22%-10.33%35.67%3.52%13.59%8.99%-12.59%6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between JELGX and ASFYX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2010

0.25

The correlation between JELGX and ASFYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (5 years) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JELGX vs. ASFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JELGX
JELGX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
JELGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JELGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
JELGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
JELGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JELGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

ASFYX
ASFYX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
ASFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ASFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JELGX vs. ASFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Growth Portfolio (JELGX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JELGXASFYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.46

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.60

8.64

-0.04

JELGX vs. ASFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JELGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the ASFYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JELGX and ASFYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JELGX vs. ASFYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JELGX drawdown since its inception was -58.74%, which is greater than ASFYX's maximum drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JELGX and ASFYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JELGXASFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.74%

-36.43%

-22.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-7.42%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.77%

-30.32%

+17.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.68%

-36.43%

+17.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.45%

-36.43%

+14.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-23.08%

+21.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.36%

-13.22%

-3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

2.11%

-0.22%

Volatility

JELGX vs. ASFYX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Growth Portfolio (JELGX) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) at 4.01%. This indicates that JELGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JELGXASFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

4.01%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.99%

10.02%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.22%

12.37%

-1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.77%

13.82%

-3.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.58%

12.73%

-2.15%

JELGX vs. ASFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JELGX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ASFYX's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

JELGX vs. ASFYX - Dividend Comparison

JELGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.66%, more than ASFYX's 1.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
1.40%1.52%1.46%0.99%32.48%6.07%3.40%5.51%1.30%0.07%0.01%5.06%
JELGX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Growth Portfolio
7.66%8.21%2.68%15.02%4.73%2.20%8.29%9.21%12.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JELGX and ASFYX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JELGX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to ASFYX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JELGX dropped -58.74% vs ASFYX's -36.43%.

JELGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JELGX and ASFYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer