PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JELCX vs. BGSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JELCX vs. BGSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Conservative Portfolio (JELCX) and BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A (BGSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JELCX achieves a 3.16% return, which is significantly lower than BGSAX's 40.25% return. Over the past 10 years, JELCX has underperformed BGSAX with an annualized return of 2.10%, while BGSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 25.45% annualized return.


JELCX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.29%
YTD
3.16%
6M
3.26%
1Y
10.11%
3Y*
6.18%
5Y*
1.25%
10Y*
2.10%

BGSAX

1D
-2.00%
1M
11.03%
YTD
40.25%
6M
37.20%
1Y
63.22%
3Y*
39.48%
5Y*
16.87%
10Y*
25.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JELCX vs. BGSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JELCX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Conservative Portfolio
3.16%8.84%3.59%5.49%-14.80%3.47%3.39%13.38%-2.18%3.24%
BGSAX
BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A
40.25%19.63%40.56%49.09%-43.13%8.19%86.27%43.84%2.03%49.45%

Correlation

The correlation between JELCX and BGSAX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2000

0.52

The correlation between JELCX and BGSAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JELCX vs. BGSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JELCX
JELCX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
JELCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JELCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JELCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
JELCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
JELCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

BGSAX
BGSAX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BGSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BGSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JELCX vs. BGSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Conservative Portfolio (JELCX) and BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A (BGSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JELCXBGSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.42

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

3.42

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.50

10.27

+1.23

JELCX vs. BGSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JELCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the BGSAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JELCX and BGSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JELCXBGSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

2.55

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.61

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.99

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.45

-0.39

Drawdowns

JELCX vs. BGSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JELCX drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, smaller than the maximum BGSAX drawdown of -73.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JELCX and BGSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JELCXBGSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.80%

-73.75%

+39.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.05%

-18.49%

+14.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.02%

-27.75%

+20.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.46%

-49.22%

+30.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.46%

-49.22%

+30.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-2.59%

+2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.46%

-26.36%

+15.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

6.15%

-5.22%

Volatility

JELCX vs. BGSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Conservative Portfolio (JELCX) is 1.63%, while BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A (BGSAX) has a volatility of 9.56%. This indicates that JELCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JELCXBGSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

9.56%

-7.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.77%

20.41%

-16.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.09%

24.84%

-19.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.31%

27.76%

-21.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.55%

25.88%

-20.33%

JELCX vs. BGSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JELCX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BGSAX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

JELCX vs. BGSAX - Dividend Comparison

JELCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than BGSAX's 9.66% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BGSAX
BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A
9.66%13.55%8.68%0.00%0.00%7.66%4.86%1.50%1.24%8.01%1.17%
JELCX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Conservative Portfolio
3.69%3.81%3.39%5.18%3.05%3.12%4.47%2.39%5.92%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JELCX and BGSAX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGSAX has higher volatility (9.56%) compared to JELCX (1.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JELCX dropped -33.80% vs BGSAX's -73.75%.

BGSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JELCX and BGSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer