JEGP.L vs. LDGL.L
JEGP.L (JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist) and LDGL.L (L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both Global Equity Income funds. JEGP.L is actively managed, while LDGL.L is passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JEGP.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for LDGL.L.
Performance
JEGP.L vs. LDGL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JEGP.L is traded in GBp, while LDGL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LDGL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
JEGP.L
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- -1.87%
- 6M
- -1.08%
- 1Y
- 2.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LDGL.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEGP.L vs. LDGL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JEGP.L JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist | -2.59% |
LDGL.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 7.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between JEGP.L and LDGL.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2026 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JEGP.L vs. LDGL.L — Risk / Return Rank
JEGP.L
LDGL.L
JEGP.L vs. LDGL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist (JEGP.L) and L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JEGP.L | LDGL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.75 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JEGP.L | LDGL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.52 | -0.98 |
Drawdowns
JEGP.L vs. LDGL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEGP.L drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, which is greater than LDGL.L's maximum drawdown of -8.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEGP.L and LDGL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEGP.L | LDGL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -8.76% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -0.85% | -6.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -2.70% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | — | — |
Volatility
JEGP.L vs. LDGL.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JEGP.L | LDGL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.46% | 14.37% | -5.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.29% | 14.37% | -5.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.29% | 14.37% | -5.08% |
JEGP.L vs. LDGL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JEGP.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LDGL.L's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
JEGP.L vs. LDGL.L - Dividend Comparison
JEGP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.82%, more than LDGL.L's 1.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEGP.L JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist | 8.82% | 8.01% | 6.39% |
LDGL.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JEGP.L and LDGL.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDGL.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDGL.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEGP.L.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JEGP.L and 0.29% for LDGL.L.
Find the right allocation for JEGP.L and LDGL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer