JEDG.L vs. XDWM.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JEDG.L (VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF) and XDWM.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C) are both Industrials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, from VanEck and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JEDG.L returned 65.85%/yr vs 12.58%/yr for XDWM.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JEDG.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWM.L.

Performance

JEDG.L vs. XDWM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

JEDG.L is traded in GBP, while XDWM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDWM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEDG.L achieves a 74.89% return, which is significantly higher than XDWM.L's 15.90% return.

JEDG.L

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: 23.72%
• YTD: 74.89%
• 6M: 96.65%
• 1Y: 211.91%
• 3Y*: 65.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XDWM.L

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 4.30%
• YTD: 15.90%
• 6M: 19.20%
• 1Y: 33.42%
• 3Y*: 12.58%
• 5Y*: 8.05%
• 10Y*: 11.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEDG.L vs. XDWM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JEDG.L VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF	74.89%	80.38%	46.13%	6.44%	-12.08%
XDWM.L Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C	15.90%	18.09%	-4.99%	9.10%	5.70%

Correlation

The correlation between JEDG.L and XDWM.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2022	0.46

Return for Risk

JEDG.L vs. XDWM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEDG.L

JEDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 95
JEDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
JEDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
JEDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 92
JEDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
JEDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 95

XDWM.L

XDWM.L Risk / Return Rank: 47
XDWM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
XDWM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
XDWM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 46
XDWM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
XDWM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEDG.L vs. XDWM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JEDG.L	XDWM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.77	1.84	+2.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.77	2.51	+2.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.33	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.18	2.30	+6.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	30.71	9.24	+21.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JEDG.L vs. XDWM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEDG.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.77, which is higher than the XDWM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEDG.L and XDWM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JEDG.L	XDWM.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.77	1.84	+2.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.36	0.86	+0.49

Drawdowns

JEDG.L vs. XDWM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEDG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.80%, smaller than the maximum XDWM.L drawdown of -29.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEDG.L and XDWM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	JEDG.L	XDWM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.80%	-29.05%	+2.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.94%	-14.47%	-8.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.80%	-18.53%	-8.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.53%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.90%	-2.96%	-10.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.86%	-5.33%	-3.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.87%	3.61%	+3.26%

Volatility

JEDG.L vs. XDWM.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDG.L) has a higher volatility of 18.94% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.L) at 6.99%. This indicates that JEDG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JEDG.L	XDWM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.94%	6.99%	+11.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.54%	15.69%	+18.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.16%	18.08%	+26.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.12%	17.24%	+15.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.12%	21.53%	+11.59%

JEDG.L vs. XDWM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEDG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWM.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

JEDG.L vs. XDWM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JEDG.L nor XDWM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JEDG.L and XDWM.L in my portfolio?

JEDG.L and XDWM.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JEDG.L or XDWM.L?

On fees, XDWM.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JEDG.L or XDWM.L?

XDWM.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for JEDG.L.

What is the main difference between JEDG.L and XDWM.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for JEDG.L and 0.25% for XDWM.L.