PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JEDG.L vs. MOAT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JEDG.L vs. MOAT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDG.L) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JEDG.L is traded in GBP, while MOAT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MOAT.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEDG.L achieves a 74.89% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT.L's -2.27% return.


JEDG.L

1D
1.49%
1M
23.72%
YTD
74.89%
6M
96.65%
1Y
211.91%
3Y*
65.85%
5Y*
10Y*

MOAT.L

1D
1.08%
1M
4.43%
YTD
-2.27%
6M
-3.00%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
5.44%
5Y*
4.30%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEDG.L vs. MOAT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JEDG.L
VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF
74.89%80.38%46.13%6.44%-12.08%
MOAT.L
VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF
-2.27%-0.31%13.06%12.45%0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between JEDG.L and MOAT.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2022

0.46

The correlation between JEDG.L and MOAT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JEDG.L vs. MOAT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEDG.L
JEDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
JEDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
JEDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT.L
MOAT.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MOAT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEDG.L vs. MOAT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDG.L) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JEDG.LMOAT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.13

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.18

0.86

+8.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.71

2.03

+28.68

JEDG.L vs. MOAT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEDG.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.77, which is higher than the MOAT.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEDG.L and MOAT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JEDG.LMOAT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.77

0.69

+4.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

0.73

+0.62

Drawdowns

JEDG.L vs. MOAT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEDG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.80%, which is greater than MOAT.L's maximum drawdown of -25.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEDG.L and MOAT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JEDG.LMOAT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.80%

-25.07%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.94%

-10.93%

-12.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.80%

-23.01%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.90%

-6.67%

-7.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.86%

-4.46%

-4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.87%

4.62%

+2.25%

Volatility

JEDG.L vs. MOAT.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDG.L) has a higher volatility of 18.94% compared to VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) at 3.72%. This indicates that JEDG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JEDG.LMOAT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.94%

3.72%

+15.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.54%

9.68%

+24.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.16%

13.50%

+30.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.12%

15.60%

+17.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.12%

16.94%

+16.18%

JEDG.L vs. MOAT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEDG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

JEDG.L vs. MOAT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JEDG.L nor MOAT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JEDG.L and MOAT.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MOAT.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MOAT.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for JEDG.L.

JEDG.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while MOAT.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. JEDG.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while MOAT.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for JEDG.L and 0.49% for MOAT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JEDG.L and MOAT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer