PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JDVWX vs. JHNBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JDVWX vs. JHNBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Disciplined Value Fund (JDVWX) and John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JDVWX achieves a 16.53% return, which is significantly higher than JHNBX's 0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, JDVWX has outperformed JHNBX with an annualized return of 12.81%, while JHNBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.21% annualized return.


JDVWX

1D
-0.10%
1M
5.47%
YTD
16.53%
6M
17.02%
1Y
33.82%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
12.57%
10Y*
12.81%

JHNBX

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.77%
1Y
5.47%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
2.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JDVWX vs. JHNBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JDVWX
John Hancock Disciplined Value Fund
16.53%17.59%15.76%14.03%-4.34%29.99%1.73%22.77%-9.64%18.00%
JHNBX
John Hancock Bond Fund
0.32%7.53%1.97%6.24%-15.22%-0.68%10.31%10.09%-1.15%4.94%

Correlation

The correlation between JDVWX and JHNBX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2011

-0.07

The correlation between JDVWX and JHNBX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JDVWX vs. JHNBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JDVWX
JDVWX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
JDVWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JDVWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
JDVWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
JDVWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
JDVWX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

JHNBX
JHNBX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
JHNBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHNBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHNBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
JHNBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHNBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JDVWX vs. JHNBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value Fund (JDVWX) and John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JDVWXJHNBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.23

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

1.62

+2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.95

4.93

+13.02

JDVWX vs. JHNBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JDVWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the JHNBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JDVWX and JHNBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JDVWXJHNBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

1.33

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.00

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.45

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.75

-0.04

Drawdowns

JDVWX vs. JHNBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDVWX drawdown since its inception was -40.28%, which is greater than JHNBX's maximum drawdown of -24.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDVWX and JHNBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JDVWXJHNBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.28%

-24.74%

-15.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.92%

-3.25%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.48%

-6.69%

-13.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.48%

-20.13%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.28%

-20.13%

-20.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-2.07%

+1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-4.15%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.07%

+0.79%

Volatility

JDVWX vs. JHNBX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Disciplined Value Fund (JDVWX) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX) at 1.38%. This indicates that JDVWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHNBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JDVWXJHNBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

1.38%

+2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

2.91%

+6.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

3.99%

+8.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

5.87%

+11.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.90%

4.91%

+13.99%

JDVWX vs. JHNBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JDVWX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than JHNBX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

JDVWX vs. JHNBX - Dividend Comparison

JDVWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than JHNBX's 4.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JDVWX
John Hancock Disciplined Value Fund
5.77%6.72%14.04%7.30%7.26%14.72%1.66%5.95%10.70%4.60%1.32%3.44%
JHNBX
John Hancock Bond Fund
4.48%4.41%4.14%3.80%2.93%3.30%5.50%3.75%3.51%3.23%3.19%3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


JDVWX and JHNBX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JDVWX has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to JHNBX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDVWX dropped -40.28% vs JHNBX's -24.74%.

JDVWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JDVWX and JHNBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer