PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JDVI vs. JHCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JDVI vs. JHCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Disciplined Value International Select ETF (JDVI) and John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JDVI achieves a 13.16% return, which is significantly higher than JHCR's 0.43% return.


JDVI

1D
0.90%
1M
4.18%
YTD
13.16%
6M
16.49%
1Y
31.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JHCR

1D
0.11%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.55%
1Y
5.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JDVI vs. JHCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JDVI
John Hancock Disciplined Value International Select ETF
13.16%42.97%0.41%
JHCR
John Hancock Core Bond ETF
0.43%7.54%-0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between JDVI and JHCR is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JDVI vs. JHCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JDVI
JDVI Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
JDVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JDVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
JDVI Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
JDVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
JDVI Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

JHCR
JHCR Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JHCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHCR Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
JHCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHCR Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JDVI vs. JHCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value International Select ETF (JDVI) and John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JDVIJHCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.23

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

1.85

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.54

5.61

+3.93

JDVI vs. JHCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JDVI Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the JHCR Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JDVI and JHCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JDVIJHCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

1.27

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.42

1.13

+0.29

Drawdowns

JDVI vs. JHCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDVI drawdown since its inception was -14.97%, which is greater than JHCR's maximum drawdown of -2.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDVI and JHCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JDVIJHCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.97%

-2.85%

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-2.84%

-9.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-1.51%

+1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.79%

-0.77%

-2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

0.94%

+2.36%

Volatility

JDVI vs. JHCR - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Disciplined Value International Select ETF (JDVI) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR) at 1.51%. This indicates that JDVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JDVIJHCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

1.51%

+4.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.99%

3.11%

+10.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.39%

4.19%

+12.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.41%

4.69%

+11.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.41%

4.69%

+11.72%

JDVI vs. JHCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

JDVI has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than JHCR's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

JDVI vs. JHCR - Dividend Comparison

JDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than JHCR's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
JDVI
John Hancock Disciplined Value International Select ETF
2.14%2.43%1.87%
JHCR
John Hancock Core Bond ETF
4.23%4.65%0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


JDVI and JHCR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JDVI has higher volatility (5.70%) compared to JHCR (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDVI dropped -14.97% vs JHCR's -2.85%.

On 1-year performance, JDVI leads with 31.39% vs 5.24% for JHCR. On fees, JHCR is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JHCR has been the lower-risk option at 1.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JDVI has performed better with a 31.39% return vs 5.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHCR is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for JDVI.

JHCR has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 2.14% for JDVI.

JDVI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while JHCR is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for JDVI and 0.29% for JHCR.

JDVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JDVI and JHCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer