JDST vs. EDGH
JDST (Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares) and EDGH (3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JDST is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (-300%), while EDGH is a Commodities fund actively managed by 3EDGE Asset Management. JDST is passively managed, while EDGH is actively managed. Over the past year, JDST returned -75.99% vs 23.98% for EDGH. At a correlation of -0.74, they often move in opposite directions. JDST charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for EDGH.
Performance
JDST vs. EDGH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JDST achieves a -15.75% return, which is significantly lower than EDGH's 7.09% return.
JDST
- 1D
- 7.16%
- 1M
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- -15.75%
- 1Y
- -75.99%
- 3Y*
- -65.43%
- 5Y*
- -52.35%
- 10Y*
- -60.31%
EDGH
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- 6M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 23.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JDST vs. EDGH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JDST Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares | -15.75% | -91.10% | 20.44% |
EDGH 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF | 7.09% | 28.98% | -1.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between JDST and EDGH is -0.70, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024 | -0.74 |
The correlation between JDST and EDGH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.74 to -0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JDST vs. EDGH — Risk / Return Rank
JDST
EDGH
JDST vs. EDGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares (JDST) and 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JDST | EDGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.27 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 1.93 | -2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 5.45 | -6.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JDST vs. EDGH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JDST drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than EDGH's maximum drawdown of -12.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDST and EDGH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JDST | EDGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -12.47% | -87.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -88.98% | -12.47% | -76.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -9.37% | -90.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -95.33% | -2.47% | -92.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.33% | 4.41% | +65.92% |
Volatility
JDST vs. EDGH - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares (JDST) has a higher volatility of 34.78% compared to 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH) at 4.00%. This indicates that JDST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JDST | EDGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.78% | 4.00% | +30.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 86.06% | 14.97% | +71.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.38% | 18.23% | +87.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.47% | 15.57% | +66.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 104.51% | 15.57% | +88.94% |
JDST vs. EDGH - Expense Ratio Comparison
JDST has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than EDGH's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
JDST vs. EDGH - Dividend Comparison
JDST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, more than EDGH's 1.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDGH 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF | 1.10% | 1.18% | 3.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JDST Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares | 5.76% | 15.08% | 6.50% | 4.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.75% | 3.16% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JDST and EDGH have a correlation of -0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JDST has higher volatility (34.78%) compared to EDGH (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDST dropped -100.00% vs EDGH's -12.47%.
On 1-year performance, EDGH leads with 23.98% vs -75.99% for JDST. On fees, EDGH is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, EDGH has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EDGH has performed better with a 23.98% return vs -75.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EDGH is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for JDST.
JDST has the higher dividend yield at 5.76%, compared with 1.10% for EDGH.
JDST is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EDGH is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and 3EDGE Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for JDST and 1.01% for EDGH.
EDGH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JDST and EDGH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer