JDOC vs. TRUH

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

JDOC (Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF) and TRUH (VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JDOC charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUH.

Performance

JDOC vs. TRUH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC) and VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

JDOC

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -2.51%
• 6M: 2.15%
• YTD: 4.29%
• 1Y: 23.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.54%

TRUH

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -0.53%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
JDOC Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF	$21.20K	$19.99K	$31.46K
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF	$24.34K	$32.62K	$24.57K

JDOC vs. TRUH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
JDOC Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF	7.67%
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF	10.68%

Correlation

The correlation between JDOC and TRUH is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026	0.92

Return for Risk

JDOC vs. TRUH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JDOC

JDOC Risk / Return Rank: 63
JDOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
JDOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
JDOC Omega Ratio Rank: 61
JDOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
JDOC Martin Ratio Rank: 51

TRUH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JDOC vs. TRUH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC) and VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JDOC	TRUH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.25	—	—

Drawdowns

JDOC vs. TRUH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDOC drawdown since its inception was -20.87%, which is greater than TRUH's maximum drawdown of -4.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDOC and TRUH.

Drawdown Indicators

	JDOC	TRUH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.87%	-4.51%	-16.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.07%	-2.99%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.72%	-1.66%	-5.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JDOC	TRUH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.64%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.60%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.82%	17.52%	-2.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.69%	17.52%	-2.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.69%	17.52%	-2.83%

JDOC vs. TRUH - Expense Ratio Comparison

JDOC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUH's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

JDOC vs. TRUH - Dividend Comparison

JDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than TRUH's 0.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
JDOC Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF	0.85%	0.89%	5.57%	0.15%
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JDOC and TRUH in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, JDOC and TRUH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, JDOC or TRUH?

On fees, TRUH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JDOC or TRUH?

TRUH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for JDOC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JDOC or TRUH?

JDOC has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.30% for TRUH.

What is the main difference between JDOC and TRUH?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JDOC and 0.10% for TRUH.