PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JDOC vs. PINK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JDOC vs. PINK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC) and Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JDOC achieves a -4.49% return, which is significantly lower than PINK's 2.39% return.


JDOC

1D
0.50%
1M
0.16%
YTD
-4.49%
6M
-4.39%
1Y
12.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PINK

1D
1.24%
1M
7.28%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.11%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JDOC vs. PINK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JDOC
Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF
-4.49%15.36%-1.04%10.71%
PINK
Simplify Health Care ETF
2.39%24.34%8.81%11.65%

Correlation

The correlation between JDOC and PINK is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023

0.79

The correlation between JDOC and PINK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

JDOC vs. PINK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JDOC
PINK

Healthcare

100.0%
93.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

6.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

JDOC
100.0%
PINK
93.1%

Basic Materials

JDOC

-

PINK

-

Communication Services

JDOC

-

PINK

-

Consumer Cyclical

JDOC

-

PINK

-

Consumer Defensive

JDOC

-

PINK

-

Energy

JDOC

-

PINK

-

Financial Services

JDOC

-

PINK
0.0%

Industrials

JDOC

-

PINK
6.9%

Real Estate

JDOC

-

PINK

-

Technology

JDOC

-

PINK

-

Utilities

JDOC

-

PINK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JDOC vs. PINK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JDOC
JDOC Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
JDOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JDOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
JDOC Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
JDOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
JDOC Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

PINK
PINK Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PINK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINK Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PINK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINK Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JDOC vs. PINK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC) and Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JDOCPINKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.29

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

1.87

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.34

5.62

-2.28

JDOC vs. PINK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JDOC Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the PINK Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JDOC and PINK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JDOCPINKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

1.73

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.56

-0.03

Drawdowns

JDOC vs. PINK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDOC drawdown since its inception was -20.87%, which is greater than PINK's maximum drawdown of -18.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDOC and PINK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JDOCPINKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.87%

-18.77%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-16.81%

+7.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.47%

-2.84%

-4.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.98%

-6.75%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

5.57%

-1.86%

Volatility

JDOC vs. PINK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC) is 3.97%, while Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that JDOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PINK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JDOCPINKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

4.36%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

13.44%

-3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.08%

18.17%

-4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.32%

17.57%

-3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.32%

17.57%

-3.25%

JDOC vs. PINK - Expense Ratio Comparison

JDOC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PINK's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JDOC vs. PINK - Dividend Comparison

JDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than PINK's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JDOC
Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF
0.93%0.89%5.57%0.15%0.00%0.00%
PINK
Simplify Health Care ETF
0.67%0.68%0.32%0.94%0.42%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


JDOC and PINK have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PINK has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to JDOC (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDOC dropped -20.87% vs PINK's -18.77%.

On 1-year performance, PINK leads with 31.27% vs 12.36% for JDOC. On fees, PINK is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, JDOC has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PINK has performed better with a 31.27% return vs 12.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PINK is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for JDOC.

JDOC has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.67% for PINK.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JDOC and 0.50% for PINK.

PINK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JDOC and PINK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer