JDOC vs. PBPH
JDOC (Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. JDOC is actively managed, while PBPH is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JDOC charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.
Performance
JDOC vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JDOC achieves a -4.49% return, which is significantly lower than PBPH's -1.13% return.
JDOC
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- -4.49%
- 6M
- -4.39%
- 1Y
- 12.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBPH
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JDOC vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JDOC Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF | -4.49% | -1.83% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | -1.13% | 0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between JDOC and PBPH is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JDOC vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank
JDOC
PBPH
JDOC vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JDOC | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.34 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JDOC | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | -0.04 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
JDOC vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JDOC drawdown since its inception was -20.87%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDOC and PBPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JDOC | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.87% | -11.10% | -9.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.47% | -8.69% | +1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.98% | -4.23% | -2.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | — | — |
Volatility
JDOC vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JDOC | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.08% | 16.78% | -2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 16.78% | -2.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 16.78% | -2.46% |
JDOC vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
JDOC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
JDOC vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison
JDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than PBPH's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JDOC Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF | 0.93% | 0.89% | 5.57% | 0.15% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JDOC and PBPH have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for JDOC.
JDOC has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.09% for PBPH.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JDOC and 0.13% for PBPH.
Find the right allocation for JDOC and PBPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer