JDOC vs. PBPH
JDOC (Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. JDOC is actively managed, while PBPH is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JDOC charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.
Performance
JDOC vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JDOC achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly lower than PBPH's 6.41% return.
JDOC
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 4.29%
- 1Y
- 23.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.54%
PBPH
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -3.76%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 6.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $21.20K | $19.99K | $31.46K | |
| $2.66M | $2.41M | $3.76M |
JDOC vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JDOC Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF | 4.29% | 0.17% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 6.41% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between JDOC and PBPH is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JDOC vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank
JDOC
PBPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JDOC vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JDOC | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.25 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JDOC vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JDOC drawdown since its inception was -20.87%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDOC and PBPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JDOC | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.87% | -11.10% | -9.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.07% | -4.20% | +1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -4.04% | -2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | — | — |
Volatility
JDOC vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JDOC | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.60% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.82% | 17.86% | -3.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 17.86% | -3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 17.86% | -3.17% |
JDOC vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
JDOC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
JDOC vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison
JDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than PBPH's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JDOC Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF | 0.85% | 0.89% | 5.57% | 0.15% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, JDOC and PBPH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for JDOC.
JDOC has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.09% for PBPH.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JDOC and 0.13% for PBPH.
Find the right allocation for JDOC and PBPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer