PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JDMNX vs. JNGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JDMNX vs. JNGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class N (JDMNX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JDMNX achieves a 7.19% return, which is significantly lower than JNGTX's 36.04% return. Over the past 10 years, JDMNX has underperformed JNGTX with an annualized return of 13.22%, while JNGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 25.12% annualized return.


JDMNX

1D
0.71%
1M
2.28%
YTD
7.19%
6M
5.39%
1Y
13.97%
3Y*
12.97%
5Y*
7.25%
10Y*
13.22%

JNGTX

1D
0.53%
1M
10.68%
YTD
36.04%
6M
35.49%
1Y
57.72%
3Y*
37.19%
5Y*
17.80%
10Y*
25.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JDMNX vs. JNGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JDMNX
Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class N
7.19%7.77%15.40%18.15%-15.92%17.17%20.55%35.41%-0.80%26.41%
JNGTX
Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D
36.04%25.00%32.34%55.33%-37.63%17.53%51.18%45.15%0.92%44.69%

Correlation

The correlation between JDMNX and JNGTX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2012

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between JDMNX and JNGTX has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JDMNX vs. JNGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JDMNX
JDMNX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
JDMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JDMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
JDMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
JDMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
JDMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

JNGTX
JNGTX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
JNGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
JNGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JDMNX vs. JNGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class N (JDMNX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JDMNXJNGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.43

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

3.70

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.57

12.27

-7.70

JDMNX vs. JNGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JDMNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the JNGTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JDMNX and JNGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JDMNX vs. JNGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDMNX drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, smaller than the maximum JNGTX drawdown of -84.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDMNX and JNGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JDMNXJNGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.24%

-84.79%

+46.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.37%

-15.93%

+4.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.53%

-23.91%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.15%

-46.46%

+22.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.24%

-46.46%

+8.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

0.00%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-40.16%

+36.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

4.80%

-1.53%

Volatility

JDMNX vs. JNGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class N (JDMNX) is 4.84%, while Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX) has a volatility of 11.75%. This indicates that JDMNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JDMNXJNGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

11.75%

-6.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.22%

19.58%

-8.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

23.17%

-8.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.75%

26.84%

-9.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.75%

24.80%

-6.05%

JDMNX vs. JNGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JDMNX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than JNGTX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

JDMNX vs. JNGTX - Dividend Comparison

JDMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, less than JNGTX's 9.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JDMNX
Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class N
6.96%7.46%7.00%7.40%10.36%15.92%8.49%4.52%6.48%1.76%1.86%3.62%
JNGTX
Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D
9.86%13.42%11.65%0.77%0.00%15.86%8.99%8.55%6.61%7.47%4.83%7.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


JDMNX and JNGTX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNGTX has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to JDMNX (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDMNX dropped -38.24% vs JNGTX's -84.79%.

JNGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JDMNX and JNGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer