JDIV vs. GSWO
JDIV (JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF) and GSWO (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. JDIV is actively managed, while GSWO is passively managed. Over the past year, JDIV returned 15.45% vs 20.17% for GSWO. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JDIV charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GSWO.
Performance
JDIV vs. GSWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JDIV achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly lower than GSWO's 11.00% return.
JDIV
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- 15.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSWO
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 11.00%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 20.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JDIV vs. GSWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JDIV JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF | 5.96% | 18.98% | -5.27% |
GSWO Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF | 11.00% | 18.97% | -2.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between JDIV and GSWO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | 0.85 |
The correlation between JDIV and GSWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JDIV vs. GSWO — Risk / Return Rank
JDIV
GSWO
JDIV vs. GSWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF (JDIV) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JDIV | GSWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.35 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 2.27 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.62 | 10.87 | -4.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JDIV | GSWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 1.88 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.99 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
JDIV vs. GSWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JDIV drawdown since its inception was -13.34%, smaller than the maximum GSWO drawdown of -17.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDIV and GSWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JDIV | GSWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.34% | -17.77% | +4.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -8.93% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.71% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -3.25% | +1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 1.86% | +0.48% |
Volatility
JDIV vs. GSWO - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF (JDIV) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO) at 3.22%. This indicates that JDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JDIV | GSWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | 3.22% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.44% | 9.02% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.69% | 10.75% | +0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.10% | 12.96% | +1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.10% | 12.96% | +1.14% |
JDIV vs. GSWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
JDIV has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than GSWO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
JDIV vs. GSWO - Dividend Comparison
JDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than GSWO's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSWO Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF | 1.61% | 1.74% | 1.75% | 2.06% | 1.73% |
JDIV JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF | 2.06% | 2.15% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JDIV and GSWO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JDIV has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to GSWO (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDIV dropped -13.34% vs GSWO's -17.77%.
On 1-year performance, GSWO leads with 20.17% vs 15.45% for JDIV. On fees, GSWO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GSWO has been the lower-risk option at 3.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GSWO has performed better with a 20.17% return vs 15.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSWO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for JDIV.
JDIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 1.61% for GSWO.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for JDIV and 0.25% for GSWO.
GSWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JDIV and GSWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer