PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JDIV vs. AVGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JDIV vs. AVGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF (JDIV) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JDIV achieves a 3.84% return, which is significantly lower than AVGV's 16.61% return.


JDIV

1D
-2.28%
1M
-0.99%
YTD
3.84%
6M
3.70%
1Y
12.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVGV

1D
-1.36%
1M
0.85%
YTD
16.61%
6M
15.61%
1Y
35.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JDIV vs. AVGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JDIV
JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF
3.84%18.98%-5.07%
AVGV
Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF
16.61%22.57%-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between JDIV and AVGV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2024

0.87

The correlation between JDIV and AVGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

JDIV vs. AVGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JDIV
AVGV

Technology

23.9%
12.1%

Financial Services

16.0%
21.3%

Healthcare

10.2%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
14.7%

Industrials

7.1%
16.2%

Communication Services

6.5%
5.0%

Energy

4.1%
12.4%

Utilities

3.4%
0.7%

Basic Materials

1.7%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%
5.2%

Real Estate

1.3%
0.7%

Technology

JDIV
23.9%
AVGV
12.1%

Financial Services

JDIV
16.0%
AVGV
21.3%

Healthcare

JDIV
10.2%
AVGV
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

JDIV
7.7%
AVGV
14.7%

Industrials

JDIV
7.1%
AVGV
16.2%

Communication Services

JDIV
6.5%
AVGV
5.0%

Energy

JDIV
4.1%
AVGV
12.4%

Utilities

JDIV
3.4%
AVGV
0.7%

Basic Materials

JDIV
1.7%
AVGV
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

JDIV
1.5%
AVGV
5.2%

Real Estate

JDIV
1.3%
AVGV
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JDIV vs. AVGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JDIV
JDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
JDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
JDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
JDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
JDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGV
AVGV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AVGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JDIV vs. AVGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF (JDIV) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JDIVAVGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.47

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

4.36

-3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

16.95

-11.75

JDIV vs. AVGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the AVGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JDIV and AVGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JDIV vs. AVGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDIV drawdown since its inception was -13.34%, smaller than the maximum AVGV drawdown of -17.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDIV and AVGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JDIVAVGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.34%

-17.03%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-8.12%

-1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.64%

-1.88%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.99%

-2.27%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

2.09%

+0.27%

Volatility

JDIV vs. AVGV - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF (JDIV) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) have volatilities of 4.76% and 4.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JDIVAVGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

4.56%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.28%

10.46%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.35%

13.41%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.28%

15.03%

-0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.28%

15.03%

-0.75%

JDIV vs. AVGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JDIV has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGV's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

JDIV vs. AVGV - Dividend Comparison

JDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than AVGV's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AVGV
Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF
2.49%1.98%2.32%1.14%
JDIV
JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF
2.11%2.15%0.36%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JDIV and AVGV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JDIV has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to AVGV (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDIV dropped -13.34% vs AVGV's -17.03%.

On 1-year performance, AVGV leads with 35.25% vs 12.26% for JDIV. On fees, AVGV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, AVGV has been the lower-risk option at 4.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVGV has performed better with a 35.25% return vs 12.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVGV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for JDIV.

AVGV has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 2.11% for JDIV.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for JDIV and 0.26% for AVGV.

AVGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JDIV and AVGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer