JCTR vs. GLD
JCTR (JPMorgan Carbon Transition U.S. Equity ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - JCTR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the JPMorgan Asset Management Carbon Transition U.S. Equity Index, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JCTR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
JCTR vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JCTR
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLD
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 3.77%
- 6M
- 6.24%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- 31.19%
- 5Y*
- 18.35%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
JCTR vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCTR JPMorgan Carbon Transition U.S. Equity ETF | 0.00% | 13.55% | 24.74% | 27.51% | -18.76% | 29.86% | 2.11% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 3.77% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 3.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between JCTR and GLD is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2020 | 0.10 |
The correlation between JCTR and GLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JCTR vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JCTR
GLD
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Technology
JCTR
GLD
-
Financial Services
JCTR
GLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
JCTR
GLD
-
Healthcare
JCTR
GLD
-
Communication Services
JCTR
GLD
-
Industrials
JCTR
GLD
-
Energy
JCTR
GLD
-
Consumer Defensive
JCTR
GLD
-
Real Estate
JCTR
GLD
-
Utilities
JCTR
GLD
-
Basic Materials
JCTR
GLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JCTR vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
JCTR
GLD
JCTR vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Carbon Transition U.S. Equity ETF (JCTR) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JCTR | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.60 | — |
Drawdowns
JCTR vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JCTR | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -45.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -17.07% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -16.16% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.81% | — |
Volatility
JCTR vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JCTR | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 26.60% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 18.00% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 15.95% | — |
JCTR vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
JCTR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
JCTR vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
JCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JCTR JPMorgan Carbon Transition U.S. Equity ETF | 0.43% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.88% | 1.53% | 1.13% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JCTR and GLD have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JCTR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JCTR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.
JCTR has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
JCTR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GLD is Gold. JCTR tracks JPMorgan Asset Management Carbon Transition U.S. Equity Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for JCTR and 0.40% for GLD.
Find the right allocation for JCTR and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer