PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JCPI vs. STIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JCPI vs. STIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCPI achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than STIP's 2.04% return.


JCPI

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
1.72%
6M
1.37%
1Y
5.63%
3Y*
5.32%
5Y*
10Y*

STIP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.03%
YTD
2.04%
6M
2.03%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
3.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCPI vs. STIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JCPI
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
1.72%7.10%4.70%5.04%-5.53%
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
2.04%6.03%4.77%4.63%-2.32%

Correlation

The correlation between JCPI and STIP is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2022

0.80

The correlation between JCPI and STIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JCPI vs. STIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCPI
JCPI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JCPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCPI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
JCPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCPI Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

STIP
STIP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
STIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
STIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
STIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCPI vs. STIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JCPISTIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.69

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

6.76

-3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.18

26.37

-14.18

JCPI vs. STIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the STIP Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCPI and STIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JCPISTIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

3.23

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

1.07

-0.39

Drawdowns

JCPI vs. STIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCPI drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, which is greater than STIP's maximum drawdown of -5.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCPI and STIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JCPISTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-5.50%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.60%

-0.69%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.81%

-0.95%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.03%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-0.99%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

0.18%

+0.28%

Volatility

JCPI vs. STIP - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) has a higher volatility of 0.86% compared to iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) at 0.40%. This indicates that JCPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JCPISTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

0.40%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.05%

0.99%

+1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95%

1.46%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.50%

2.75%

+1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.50%

2.45%

+2.05%

JCPI vs. STIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCPI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than STIP's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JCPI vs. STIP - Dividend Comparison

JCPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than STIP's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JCPI
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
3.93%3.93%3.98%3.45%3.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
4.30%4.11%2.62%2.84%6.04%4.15%1.40%2.06%2.44%1.59%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


JCPI and STIP have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JCPI has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to STIP (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCPI dropped -7.85% vs STIP's -5.50%.

On 3-year performance, JCPI leads with 5.32% vs 5.23% for STIP. On fees, STIP is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, STIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JCPI has performed better with a 5.32% return vs 5.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STIP is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JCPI.

STIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 3.93% for JCPI.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JCPI and 0.06% for STIP.

STIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JCPI and STIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer