JCPI vs. PBTP
JCPI (JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF) and PBTP (Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. JCPI is actively managed, while PBTP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JCPI returned 5.05%/yr vs 5.11%/yr for PBTP. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. JCPI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PBTP.
Performance
JCPI vs. PBTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JCPI achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than PBTP's 1.86% return.
JCPI
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- 2.13%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.69%
PBTP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 3.00%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.59M | $2.28M | $2.32M | |
| $1.49M | $1.29M | $1.24M |
JCPI vs. PBTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCPI JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF | 0.75% | 7.10% | 4.70% | 5.04% | -5.53% |
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 1.86% | 5.98% | 4.72% | 4.53% | -2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between JCPI and PBTP is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2022 | 0.76 |
The correlation between JCPI and PBTP shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JCPI vs. PBTP — Risk / Return Rank
JCPI
PBTP
JCPI vs. PBTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JCPI | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.45 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 4.57 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.79 | 14.12 | -9.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JCPI vs. PBTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JCPI drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, which is greater than PBTP's maximum drawdown of -5.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCPI and PBTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JCPI | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -5.44% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.60% | -0.76% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.77% | -1.03% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -0.30% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -0.74% | -1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.60% | 0.25% | +0.35% |
Volatility
JCPI vs. PBTP - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) at 0.38%. This indicates that JCPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBTP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JCPI | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | 0.38% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.36% | 1.18% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.06% | 1.60% | +1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.47% | 2.84% | +1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.47% | 2.63% | +1.84% |
JCPI vs. PBTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
JCPI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PBTP's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JCPI vs. PBTP - Dividend Comparison
JCPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than PBTP's 4.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCPI JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF | 3.91% | 3.93% | 3.98% | 3.45% | 3.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 4.80% | 3.82% | 2.59% | 2.36% | 5.33% | 3.12% | 1.25% | 2.12% | 2.33% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JCPI and PBTP have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JCPI has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to PBTP (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCPI dropped -7.85% vs PBTP's -5.44%.
On 3-year performance, PBTP leads with 5.11% vs 5.05% for JCPI. On fees, PBTP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, PBTP has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PBTP has performed better with a 5.11% return vs 5.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBTP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JCPI.
PBTP has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 3.91% for JCPI.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JCPI and 0.07% for PBTP.
PBTP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JCPI and PBTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer