PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JCPI vs. IWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JCPI vs. IWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCPI achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than IWP's 1.66% return.


JCPI

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.88%
YTD
1.12%
6M
1.07%
1Y
5.14%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
10Y*

IWP

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.28%
YTD
1.66%
6M
0.18%
1Y
2.82%
3Y*
15.01%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*
12.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCPI vs. IWP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JCPI
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
1.12%7.10%4.70%5.04%-5.53%
IWP
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
1.66%8.45%21.86%25.70%-12.82%

Correlation

The correlation between JCPI and IWP is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2022

0.21

JCPI vs. IWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JCPI
IWP

Basic Materials

37.1%
0.4%

Communication Services

9.8%
4.2%

Financial Services

8.2%
6.9%

Technology

7.4%
20.0%

Real Estate

4.8%
1.4%

Healthcare

4.4%
13.5%

Utilities

3.2%
2.9%

Energy

1.2%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.2%
21.1%

Industrials

0.9%
24.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
1.5%

Basic Materials

JCPI
37.1%
IWP
0.4%

Communication Services

JCPI
9.8%
IWP
4.2%

Financial Services

JCPI
8.2%
IWP
6.9%

Technology

JCPI
7.4%
IWP
20.0%

Real Estate

JCPI
4.8%
IWP
1.4%

Healthcare

JCPI
4.4%
IWP
13.5%

Utilities

JCPI
3.2%
IWP
2.9%

Energy

JCPI
1.2%
IWP
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

JCPI
1.2%
IWP
21.1%

Industrials

JCPI
0.9%
IWP
24.2%

Consumer Defensive

JCPI
0.4%
IWP
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JCPI vs. IWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCPI
JCPI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
JCPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCPI Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
JCPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCPI Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

IWP
IWP Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
IWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWP Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
IWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWP Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCPI vs. IWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JCPIIWPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.04

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

0.19

+3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.00

0.56

+10.44

JCPI vs. IWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the IWP Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCPI and IWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JCPIIWPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

0.17

+1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.42

+0.22

Drawdowns

JCPI vs. IWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCPI drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, smaller than the maximum IWP drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCPI and IWP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JCPIIWPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-56.92%

+49.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.60%

-14.79%

+13.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.81%

-25.20%

+22.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

-4.08%

+3.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-9.68%

+7.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

5.08%

-4.61%

Volatility

JCPI vs. IWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) is 0.95%, while iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that JCPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JCPIIWPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

4.62%

-3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.08%

12.93%

-10.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92%

16.71%

-13.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.50%

22.34%

-17.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.50%

21.70%

-17.20%

JCPI vs. IWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCPI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IWP's 0.23% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JCPI vs. IWP - Dividend Comparison

JCPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than IWP's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWP
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.33%0.37%0.40%0.54%0.77%0.30%0.38%0.59%1.02%0.78%1.16%0.98%
JCPI
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
3.96%3.93%3.98%3.45%3.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JCPI and IWP have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWP has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to JCPI (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCPI dropped -7.85% vs IWP's -56.92%.

On 3-year performance, IWP leads with 15.01% vs 5.20% for JCPI. On fees, IWP is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, JCPI has been the lower-risk option at 0.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IWP has performed better with a 15.01% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWP is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JCPI.

JCPI has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 0.33% for IWP.

JCPI is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while IWP is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JCPI and 0.23% for IWP.

JCPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JCPI and IWP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer