JCPI vs. IBIH
JCPI (JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF) and IBIH (iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. JCPI is actively managed, while IBIH is passively managed. Over the past year, JCPI returned 3.88% vs 3.91% for IBIH. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JCPI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIH.
Performance
JCPI vs. IBIH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JCPI having a 1.24% return and IBIH slightly lower at 1.20%.
JCPI
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 5.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIH
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JCPI vs. IBIH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JCPI JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF | 1.24% | 7.10% | 4.70% | 3.40% |
IBIH iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF | 1.20% | 8.47% | 1.73% | 4.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between JCPI and IBIH is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between JCPI and IBIH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JCPI vs. IBIH — Risk / Return Rank
JCPI
IBIH
JCPI vs. IBIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) and iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JCPI | IBIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.22 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 2.31 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.59 | 6.99 | +0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JCPI vs. IBIH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JCPI drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, which is greater than IBIH's maximum drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCPI and IBIH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JCPI | IBIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -3.94% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.60% | -1.70% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -1.02% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -0.96% | -0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.51% | 0.56% | -0.05% |
Volatility
JCPI vs. IBIH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) is 1.15%, while iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) has a volatility of 1.28%. This indicates that JCPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JCPI | IBIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 1.28% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.23% | 2.35% | -0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.04% | 3.24% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.50% | 4.93% | -0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.50% | 4.93% | -0.43% |
JCPI vs. IBIH - Expense Ratio Comparison
JCPI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIH's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JCPI vs. IBIH - Dividend Comparison
JCPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than IBIH's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIH iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF | 3.91% | 4.68% | 4.34% | 0.70% | 0.00% |
JCPI JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF | 3.95% | 3.93% | 3.98% | 3.45% | 3.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JCPI and IBIH have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIH has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to JCPI (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCPI dropped -7.85% vs IBIH's -3.94%.
On 1-year performance, IBIH leads with 3.91% vs 3.88% for JCPI. On fees, IBIH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, JCPI has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIH has performed better with a 3.91% return vs 3.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JCPI.
JCPI has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 3.91% for IBIH.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JCPI and 0.10% for IBIH.
JCPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JCPI and IBIH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer